• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Theological Studies >‘Welcome Dear Feast of Lent’: Rival Understandings of The Forty-Day Fast in Early Stuart England
【24h】

‘Welcome Dear Feast of Lent’: Rival Understandings of The Forty-Day Fast in Early Stuart England

机译：“亲爱的四旬斋盛宴”：英格兰斯图尔特早期对四十天斋戒的敌对理解

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Both during and after the Reformation, Lutherans and Reformed theologians alike had condemned the way in which Lent was observed within the Roman Catholic Church as a superstitious mockery of biblical fasting. As a result, most Protestant churches in Europe either ceased to observe Lent altogether, or made the Lent fast a matter of personal conscience. In England, by contrast, the Lent fast was enshrined by statute during the reign of Edward VI, and repeatedly enforced by royal proclamation thereafter. Early Stuart theologians responded to this national peculiarity in a number of ways. Some defended the Lent fast as a purely secular observance, intended for political ends; this was the argument favoured within the godly community. Lancelot Andrewes and John Cosin, by contrast, defended Lent as an apostolic institution, which the Church of England shared with both the early church and the Church of Rome; their argument was sufficiently similar to that of Robert Bellarmine to provoke accusations of popery. A third group of writers attempted to chart an alternative path, arguing that the Lent fast was a venerable and laudable spiritual institution, but one which was under the jurisdiction of the Church’s governors. These three positions illuminate different positions on the Church of England’s theological identity in the period after the Elizabethan Settlement.
机译：在改革期间和之后，路德派和改革神学家都谴责在罗马天主教堂观察四旬斋的方式是对圣经禁食的迷信嘲弄。结果，欧洲的大多数新教教会要么完全停止遵守四旬斋，要么使斋月斋戒成为个人良心问题。相比之下，在英格兰，四旬斋在爱德华六世统治期间被法令奉为圣地，此后又由皇家宣布反复执行。早期的斯图尔特神学家以多种方式回应了这种民族特色。有些人为大斋节辩护是纯粹出于世俗目的，是出于政治目的。这是敬虔社区内所支持的论点。兰斯洛德·安德鲁斯（Lancelot Andrewes）和约翰·科辛（John Cosin）则辩护说，四旬期是一个使徒机构，英格兰教会与早期教会和罗马教会共同拥有这家教会。他们的论点与罗伯特·贝拉明（Robert Bellarmine）的论点十分相似，从而引发了关于人口普查的指控。第三组作家试图画出一条替代之路，认为斋戒斋戒是一种古老而值得称赞的精神机构，但属于教会总督的管辖范围。这三个立场阐明了伊丽莎白女王定居时期后英格兰教会神学特性的不同立场。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号