...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research >Vesuvius: A Historical Approach To The 1631 Eruption 'cold Data' From The Analysis Of Three Contemporary Treatises
【24h】

Vesuvius: A Historical Approach To The 1631 Eruption 'cold Data' From The Analysis Of Three Contemporary Treatises

机译：维苏威火山：从三种当代论着分析对1631年爆发“冷数据”的历史探讨

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The 1631 Vesuvius eruption is one of its best known and most studied of its type. However, the historical approach performed within the framework of the Exploris project highlighted new evidence from previously unused or unknown historical sources. These consist of three treatises that were contemporary to the event; although written in Latin, they have been fully translated and analysed. To guarantee systematic use and open access to the large amount of information they contain, they have been provided as a small database. These treatises have provided new information on phenomena that preceded and accompanied the eruption of 1631, making possible the formation of a complex chronological profile, starting from around 6 months before the eruption. The anthropic impact is also outlined. The method applied has produced a chronology of "cold data", which are not interpreted from the volcanological standpoint, but only derived directly from the analysed history and sequence of the texts. The analysis of the three treatises has not, however, solved all of the problems connected with the detailed knowledge of the event in 1631. Indeed, problems of two kinds persist: a) linguistic correspondence between the volcanological terms of today and those used in the texts; b) the lack of precision of the measures indicated. Here, the main results obtained from this analysis method are presented, along with a discussion of their limitations and some new perspectives.
机译：1631年维苏威火山喷发是其类型中最著名和研究最多的火山之一。但是，在Exploris项目框架内执行的历史方法突出了来自以前未使用或未知历史来源的新证据。这包括与该活动具有当代意义的三篇论文。尽管使用拉丁文编写，但已对其进行了完整的翻译和分析。为了保证系统使用和开放访问其中包含的大量信息，它们已作为一个小型数据库提供。这些论文提供了有关1631年喷发之前和伴随的现象的新信息，使得有可能在喷发前约6个月开始形成复杂的时间序列。还概述了人类的影响。所采用的方法产生了“冷数据”的年表，从火山学的角度来看并不能解释这些数据，而只能直接从所分析的历史和文本序列中得出。然而，对这三篇论文的分析并没有解决与1631年事件的详细知识有关的所有问题。的确，仍然存在两种问题：a）当今火山学术语与火山学术语之间的语言对应文本b）所指示的措施不够精确。在这里，将介绍从这种分析方法获得的主要结果，并讨论其局限性和一些新观点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号