• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of web librarianship >The Visibility of Authority Records, Researcher Identifiers, Academic Social Networking Profiles, and Related Faculty Publications in Search Engine Results
【24h】

The Visibility of Authority Records, Researcher Identifiers, Academic Social Networking Profiles, and Related Faculty Publications in Search Engine Results

机译：在搜索引擎结果中查看权威记录，研究人员标识符，学术社交网络资料以及相关教职出版物的可见性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Information about faculty and their publications can be found in library databases such as the Library of Congress Name Authority File, VIAF, WorldCat, and institutional repositories; in identifier registries such as ORCID and ISNI; and on academic social networking sites such as Academia, Google Scholar, and ResearchGate, but the way search engines use such identifiers and profiles is unclear. Therefore, researchers at a large comprehensive university conducted several rounds of web searching before and after the creation and modification of faculty authority records. The sample consisted of 24 faculty and the 35 publications associated with their authorities. The researchers searched for the faculty and their publications on the social networking and identity websites directly, and then used Google, Bing, and Google Scholar to record which of the faculty members' profiles and publications were found within the top 50 results. Faculty with more profiles were more visible in search engine results, and faculty with authority records ranked more highly in Google. Results related to publication discovery and ranking were more inconclusive, but revealed clear differences between search tools. The implications of this exploratory research can support educational efforts about academic identities and scholarly profiles, begin a research agenda, and inform methodological development surrounding the influence of identity records and academic social networking profiles on web visibility.
机译：有关教职人员及其出版物的信息可以在图书馆数据库中找到，例如国会图书馆名称授权文件，VIAF，WorldCat和机构知识库；在标识符注册表中，例如ORCID和ISNI；以及学术界，Google学术搜索和ResearchGate等学术社交网站上，但搜索引擎使用此类标识符和个人资料的方式尚不清楚。因此，一所综合性大学的研究人员在创建和修改教师权限记录之前和之后进行了几轮网络搜索。样本包括24个教职员工及其相关部门的35种出版物。研究人员直接在社交网络和身份网站上搜索教师及其出版物，然后使用Google，Bing和Google Scholar来记录前50名结果中哪些教师的个人资料和出版物。在搜索引擎结果中，具有更多个人资料的教职员工更加可见，具有权威记录的教职员工在Google中排名更高。与出版物发现和排名有关的结果尚无定论，但揭示了搜索工具之间的明显差异。这项探索性研究的意义可以支持有关学术身份和学术档案的教育工作，启动研究议程，并为围绕身份记录和学术社交网络档案对网络可见性影响的方法发展提供信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号