• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of World Investment & Trade; Law, Economics, Politics >Addressing Domestic Regulation Affecting Trade in Services in CETA, CPTPP, and USMCA: Revolution or Timid Steps?
【24h】

Addressing Domestic Regulation Affecting Trade in Services in CETA, CPTPP, and USMCA: Revolution or Timid Steps?

机译：解决影响CETA，CPTPP和USMCA服务贸易的国内监管：革命或胆小步骤？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The number of international agreements purporting to liberalise trade, mainly focused on reducing protectionist measures through the imposition of general principles, has increased greatly over the last 25 years. More recently, the United States and the European Union (EU) concluded comprehensive agreements covering trade in goods, trade in services, and foreign investment. This article inquires whether, and the extent to which, such agreements represent a departure from previous practice. It focuses on (a) the instruments employed to address domestic regulation affecting trade in services and (b) three specific agreements concluded between 2016 and 2018: the EU-Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement, the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership, and the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement. While these recent Preferential Trade Agreements put forward novel approaches to regulatory diversity affecting trade in services, it is too early to ascertain whether these will have any ground-breaking impact in terms of services trade liberalisation.
机译：据称贸易的国际协议数量主要侧重于通过实施一般原则来减少保护主义措施，在过去的25年里大大增加。最近，美国和欧盟（欧盟）结束了综合协议，涵盖货物贸易，服务贸易和外商投资。本文询问是否，此类协议是否代表了以前的实践的离开。它侧重于（a）员工以解决影响服务贸易的国内监管和（b）2016年至2018年间三项具体协议：欧盟 - 加拿大综合经济贸易协定，跨太平洋伙伴关系的全面和逐步协议以及美国 - 墨西哥加拿大协议。虽然这些最近的优惠贸易协定提出了对影响服务贸易的监管多样性的新方法，但为时尚早，确定这些是否会对服务贸易自由化方面有任何接地的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号