...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of World Investment & Trade; Law, Economics, Politics >Dispute Settlement in eu International Investment Agreements with Third States: Three Salient Problems
【24h】

Dispute Settlement in eu International Investment Agreements with Third States: Three Salient Problems

机译：与第三国签订的欧盟国际投资协议中的争端解决：三个突出问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The eu institutions are committed to include investor-State arbitration clauses in eu has with third States. However, there are at least three unresolved problems in doing so. First, the eu is not, and is unlikely to become, a Contracting Party to the icsid Convention. While this deficiency may be remedied by replicating relevant provisions of the icsid Convention, eu investors cannot benefit from icsid's institutional clout which could facilitate enforcement of awards. Secondly, there may be problems from an eu law perspective. Arguably, the eu could only include investor-State arbitration clauses in eu iias with third States following a change in eu primary law such that investment tribunals could request a preliminary ruling from the cjeu in accordance with Article 267 tfeu. Thirdly, to date there appears to be no agreement within the eu on the question who will be the proper respondent in an arbitration.
机译：欧盟机构致力于将投资人与国家之间的仲裁条款纳入第三国。但是，这样做至少存在三个未解决的问题。首先，欧盟不是，也不太可能成为ICSIC公约的缔约方。尽管可以通过复制《国际投资担保公司公约》的有关规定来弥补这一不足，但欧盟投资者无法从国际投资担保公司的机构影响力中受益，这可以促进裁决的执行。其次，从欧盟法律的角度来看可能存在问题。可以说，在欧盟基本法发生变更之后，欧盟只能在与第三国的欧盟中包括投资人与国家之间的仲裁条款，以使投资法庭可以根据第267条的规定要求法院作出初步裁定。第三，迄今为止，欧盟内部似乎尚未就谁将是仲裁的适当被告人达成协议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号