• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of world trade >Trade Remedy Rules for Digital Services: Inapplicability of GATT-type Safeguard Rules
【24h】

Trade Remedy Rules for Digital Services: Inapplicability of GATT-type Safeguard Rules

机译：贸易救济数码服务规则：适用于GATT-Type保障规则的可执行性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Digitalization considerably complicates the application of previous trade remedy norms to the new and expanding digital services trade, and there is a need to reprioritize and restructure the existing framework to reflect this difference. Emergency safeguard is an essential element in the trade regime, but the classic concept of GATT-type safeguard measures that is based on a dichotomy of tariff and nontariff barriers and clear-cut rules between goods and services are not suitable for regulating the expanding digital services transactions where barriers tend to be much more diverse and less obvious. Hence, a new trade remedy framework must incorporate the elements of convergence, interconnectedness and externality, while taking a sectoral approach, as generic rules on trade remedies that cater to all possible scenarios and sectors are no longer suitable in these realms. It must prioritize rules-making on subsidies and domestic tax schemes, while also considering for issues specific to the digital features such as data flow restrictions and their implications.
机译：数字化对新的和扩大数字服务贸易的应用相比，将先前的贸易补救规范的适用性复杂化，并且需要恢复和重组现有框架来反映这种差异。紧急保障是贸易制度的一个基本要素，但基于关税和非公园障碍的二分法和商品和服务之间的清除规则的Gatt-Type保障措施的经典概念不适合调节扩大的数字服务障碍往往更多样化，不那么明显的交易。因此，新的贸易救济框架必须纳入收敛，互连和外部性的元素，同时采取部门方法，作为履行所有可能场景和部门的贸易补救措施的通用规则不再适合这些领域。它必须优先考虑补贴和国内税务计划的规则制定，同时考虑有关数据流限制等数字功能的问题以及其含义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号