• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of world trade >World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement Retaliatory Regime at the Tenth Anniversary of the Organization: Reshaping the 'Last Resort' Against Non-compliance
【24h】

World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement Retaliatory Regime at the Tenth Anniversary of the Organization: Reshaping the 'Last Resort' Against Non-compliance

机译：世贸组织成立十周年世界贸易组织争端解决报复制度：重塑“不得已而为之”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The dispute settlement procedures of the World Trade Organization (WTO) allow countermeasures to be imposed when a country fails to provide temporary trade compensation and at the same time is unwilling to comply with the rulings and recommendations of the Dispute Settlement Body (DSB). Increasingly sceptical about the efficiency and effectiveness of these two remedies, debates in the context of the current Doha mandate have resulted in several proposals. Apart from the fact that the current system of retaliation has been widely criticized as being the antithesis of the raison d'etre of the WTO, some of the proposals, such as tradable retaliation and pre-authorized trade compensation, though greatly welcomed by some Members, have also been criticized by others, who feel that they would, inter alia, encroach on the sovereignty of countries. Being conscious of the first ten years experimental phase of the WTO and its system of remedies for responding to continuous non-compliance, this article examines the main objective and problems associated with the WTO retaliation in the context of the international law theories of compliance. The article therefore looks at why Pre-authorized Contingent Financial Commitment (PCFC) could be a solution to the WTO remedies problems from both developed and developing countries' perspectives. The article ends with some notes of appraisal and caution.
机译：世界贸易组织（WTO）的争端解决程序允许在一个国家未能提供临时贸易补偿而又不愿意遵守争端解决机构（DSB）的裁决和建议的情况下采取反措施。人们对这两种补救办法的效力和效力越来越持怀疑态度，在目前多哈授权的背景下进行的辩论提出了几项建议。除了目前的报复制度被广泛批评为与世贸组织存在理由相对立的事实外，一些提议，例如可交易报复和预先授权的贸易赔偿，尽管受到一些成员的欢迎。也遭到其他人的批评，他们认为他们尤其会侵犯国家主权。考虑到WTO的最初十年试验阶段及其对持续不遵守行为的补救措施体系，本文在国际合规理论的背景下研究了与WTO报复相关的主要目标和问题。因此，本文从发达国家和发展中国家的角度探讨了为什么预先授权的或有财务承诺（PCFC）可以解决WTO补救措施的问题。本文以一些评估和注意事项结尾。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号