...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>JSAH: Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians >Ugliness and Judgment: On Architecture in the Public Eye
【24h】

Ugliness and Judgment: On Architecture in the Public Eye

机译：丑陋和判断：在公众眼中的建筑

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Ugliness and Judgment is a short and dense book that argues that the concept of architectural ugliness can be seen as an ingredient of a social conflict with institutional elements rather than as a matter of personal or shared aesthetic taste. In order to establish this argument, Timothy Hyde presents his hypothesis through a series of events in English architecture, because in England there is a continuous history, hundreds of years long, of civil and ecclesiastical courts arbitrating disputes in what would now be called town planning. Indeed, the power of the latter has strengthened in recent years, since the passing of the Ecclesiastical Exemption (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) (England) Order 1994 and successive legislation; such laws have not only affirmed the Church of England's right to make decisions on alterations to its "listed" (i.e., protected) buildings but also regulated this right in regard to other mainstream English Christian denominations. This backdrop provides a neat continuum for an argument that starts with the acts of individuals and makes it way up to the government-backed public inquiries of recent decades. The outstanding example of these is the case of James Stirling's "ugly" No. 1 Poultry, in the City of London, designed in 1985-88. An inquiry and subsequent appeals delayed the building's completion for ten years as the national amenity societies (voluntary organizations that advocate for the built and natural environment) joined forces with members of the public to challenge its erection on the site of protected Victorian office buildings, within a chamber set up with the furnishings and trappings of a regular courtroom.
机译：丑陋和判断是一个简短而密集的书，认为建筑丑陋的概念可以被视为与体制要素的社会冲突的成分，而不是作为个人或共同审美味道的问题。为了建立这个论点，蒂莫西海德通过英国建筑的一系列事件呈现出他的假设，因为在英格兰有一个持续的历史，数百年的历史，公民和教会法院仲裁争议现在被称为城镇规划。实际上，近年来，后者的力量加强了，自1994年常规豁免（上市建筑物和保护区）（英国）令和行动令和立法的传递;此类法律不仅肯定了英国教会对其“上市”（即受保护）建筑物的改变做出决定，而且还在其他主流英语基督教面额方面监管了这一权利。这个背景为一个始于个人行为的论证提供了一个整洁的连续体，并使近几十年的政府支持的公开查询。这些杰出的例子是詹姆斯斯特林的“丑陋”1号家禽，在伦敦市，于1985-88设计。询问和随后的上诉延迟了建筑物的完成，这是全国救济社会（倡导建造和自然环境的自愿组织）与公众成员加入武力，以挑战其在受保护维多利亚办事处办公楼的勃起设有常规法庭的家具和捕捉的腔室。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号