...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Knowledge Organization >Does the Traditional Thesaurus Have a Place in Modern Information Retrieval?
【24h】

Does the Traditional Thesaurus Have a Place in Modern Information Retrieval?

机译：传统词库在现代信息检索中是否占有一席之地？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The introduction (1.0) of this article considers the status of the thesaurus within LIS and asks about the future prospect for thesauri. The main following points are: (2.0) Any knowledge organization system (KOS) is today threatened by Google-like systems, and it is therefore important to consider if there still is a need for knowledge organization (KO) in the traditional sense. (3.0) A thesaurus is a somewhat reduced form of KOS compared to, for example, an ontology, and its "bundling" and restricted number of semantic relations has never been justified theoretically or empirically. Which semantic relations are most fruitful for a given task is thus an open question, and different domains may need different kinds of KOS including different sets of relations between terms. (4.0) A KOS is a controlled vocabulary (CV) and should not be considered a "perfect language" (Eco 1995) that is simply able to remove the ambiguity of natural language; rather much ambiguity in language represents a battle between many "voices" (Bakhtin 1981) or "paradigms" (Kuhn 1962). In this perspective, a specific KOS, e.g. a specific thesaurus, is just one "voice" among many voices, and that voice has to demonstrate its authority and utility. It is concluded (5.0) that the traditional thesaurus does not have a place in modern information retrieval, but that more flexible semantic tools based on proper studies of domains will always be important.
机译：本文的简介（1.0）考虑了同义词库在LIS中的地位，并询问了同义词库的未来前景。主要有以下几点：（2.0）今天，任何知识组织系统（KOS）都受到类似Google的系统的威胁，因此重要的是要考虑是否仍然需要传统意义上的知识组织（KO）。 （3.0）与例如本体相比，同义词库是KOS的某种简化形式，其“捆绑”和有限数量的语义关系在理论上或经验上都从未得到过证明。因此，对于给定任务哪种语义关系最有成果，这是一个悬而未决的问题，并且不同的领域可能需要不同种类的KOS，包括术语之间的不同关系集。 （4.0）KOS是一种受控词汇（CV），不应被视为能够完全消除自然语言歧义的“完美语言”（Eco 1995）；语言上的歧义表示许多“声音”（Bakhtin 1981）或“范式”（Kuhn 1962）之间的斗争。从这个角度来看，一个特定的KOS，例如一个特定的词库，只是许多声音中的一个“声音”，该声音必须证明其权威性和实用性。结论（5.0）表明，传统词库在现代信息检索中不占一席之地，但是基于对领域的正确研究而建立的更灵活的语义工具将永远是重要的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号