• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The Korean journal of defense analysis >Current Criticisms and Reframing of the Noninterference Principle of China
【24h】

Current Criticisms and Reframing of the Noninterference Principle of China

机译：当前对中国不干涉原则的批评与反思

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The "Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence" was born against the background of poverty, powerlessness and humiliation. It became the guiding principle of China's foreign policy since it was first proposed in 1953. However, several reasons led to increasing criticisms of it, especially regarding the noninterference principle. These reasons include the economic interdependence and blurring of boundaries in a globalized world, the rise of China's power, and China's extending overseas interests. The criticisms are reflected in three aspects: whether sovereignty allows for humanitarian intervention against the background of proliferating international human rights norms; whether China's behavior obeys the noninterference principle; and whether this principle can serve China's national interests. Chinese scholars respond to these criticisms in terms of three aspects: the noninterference principle should be flexibly interpreted depending on the specific background; many alternate terms of the principle like "creative involvement," "constructive intervention," and "participatory advocacy" were put forward; China's sticking to the fundamental sovereignty principle has never changed. It is sensible and necessary for China to reframe the noninterference principle based on analysis from international, regional and domestic levels. This reframing should protect China's national interests while matching the image of "responsible great power."
机译：“和平共处五项原则”是在贫穷，无能为力和屈辱的背景下诞生的。自1953年首次提出以来，它就成为中国外交政策的指导原则。但是，由于多种原因，人们对此提出了越来越多的批评，特别是在不干涉原则方面。这些原因包括经济相互依存和全球化世界中边界的模糊，中国实力的增强以及中国在海外利益的扩展。这些批评反映在三个方面：主权是否允许在激增的国际人权规范背景下进行人道主义干预；反之亦然。中国的行为是否遵守不干涉原则；这项原则是否符合中国的国家利益。中国学者从以下三个方面对这些批评做出回应：应根据具体背景灵活地解释无干扰原则。提出了许多原则上的替代术语，例如“创造性参与”，“建设性干预”和“参与性倡导”。中国坚持基本主权原则从未改变。对中国而言，基于国际，区域和国内层面的分析，重新构建无干扰原则是明智且必要的。这种调整应该在维护“负责任大国”形象的同时保护中国的国家利益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号