...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>KSCE journal of civil engineering >Comparison of Efficiency and Satisfaction Level on Different Construction Management Methods for Public Construction Projects in Korea
【24h】

Comparison of Efficiency and Satisfaction Level on Different Construction Management Methods for Public Construction Projects in Korea

机译：韩国公共建设项目不同施工管理方法的效率和满意度比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Selecting appropriate construction management method in construction projects based on owner's project management capacity can be a make-or-break element. Given the accelerated change in the construction environment, the need for an efficient project management of public construction projects is ever more important, as is the need to select an appropriate construction management method. However, most public project owners find it difficult to select construction management method that perfectly coincides with their capacities or project characteristics since they lack information on the efficiencies of various construction management methods. Under this context, construction management method is usually selected for the sake of convenience or to comply with regulatory requirements. As such, this study aims to provide a basis for project owners to select the most appropriate construction management methods for the projects concerned by analyzing the efficiency of various methods currently applied to domestic public construction projects and also by comparing and analyzing the degree of satisfaction of project participants under each construction management method. In terms of allocated manpower and costs, the inspection supervision method and the construction supervision method incurred additional costs of 42% and 52%, respectively, compared to the direct supervision method. In addition, as for time spent processing tasks, other supervision methods took more time than that of the direct supervision method leading to the conclusion that the direct supervision method appeared to be the most efficient construction management method.
机译：根据业主的项目管理能力选择合适的施工管理方法可以成败。鉴于建筑环境的加速变化，对公共建筑项目进行有效项目管理的需求变得尤为重要，选择适当的建筑管理方法也变得尤为重要。但是，大多数公共项目业主发现很难选择与其能力或项目特征完全一致的施工管理方法，因为他们缺乏有关各种施工管理方法效率的信息。在这种情况下，通常为了方便或符合法规要求而选择施工管理方法。因此，本研究旨在通过分析当前应用于国内公共建设项目的各种方法的效率，以及通过比较和分析对项目的满意程度，为项目所有者选择最合适的建筑管理方法提供依据。每种施工管理方法下的项目参与者。在分配的人力和成本方面，与直接监督方法相比，检查监督方法和施工监督方法分别产生了42％和52％的额外费用。此外，在处理任务上花费的时间方面，其他监理方法比直接监理方法要花费更多的时间，从而得出结论，直接监理方法似乎是最有效的施工管理方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号