...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Lakes & Reservoirs >Regional cooperation and benefit sharing for sustainable water resources management in the Lower Mekong Basin
【24h】

Regional cooperation and benefit sharing for sustainable water resources management in the Lower Mekong Basin

机译：湄公河下游地区可持续水资源管理的区域合作和利益共享

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Benefit sharing is a concept associated with regional cooperation for sustainablewater resources management. To this end, the present study analyses how implementationof this concept may contribute to economic growth and the promotion ofsustainable livelihoods in the Lower Mekong Basin (LMB). It focuses on the balancebetween economic and human development, national interests, and the proceduresused to manage water resources in the basin. It was found that: (a) Benefits obtainedfrom the Mekong River are not equally shared between riparian countries becauseof inadequate regional cooperation, with economic and social development in theLMB being uneven, with Thailand and Vietnam achieving better human development,poverty reduction and food security outcomes than Laos and Cambodia; (b)Lack of shared national interests, or a common development agenda, has resulted inunsustainable water resource management outcomes; and (c) Procedures for waterresources management agreed by the four LMB countries are well‐aligned with theconceptual framework for benefit sharing defined by Sadoff and Grey (2002, WaterPolicy, 4, 389), although while these procedures have the potential to facilitate a morecooperative agenda for equitable sharing of social, economic and environmental benefitsfrom the water resources of the Mekong River, implementation of the 1995Mekong Agreement currently remains controversial. The five procedures for waterresource management developed by the Mekong River Commission have not resultedin satisfactory outcomes, due in part to the institution lacking regulatory authority.
机译：利益共享是与区域合作进行可持续水资源管理有关的概念。为此，本研究分析了这一概念的实施如何对湄公河下游盆地（LMB）的经济增长和可持续生计的促进。它着重于经济与人类发展，国家利益以及流域水资源管理程序之间的平衡。结果发现：（a）由于区域合作不充分，湄公河沿岸国家在湄公河获得的利益分配不均，LMB的经济和社会发展不平衡，泰国和越南实现了更好的人类发展，减贫和粮食安全成果比老挝和柬埔寨； （b）缺乏共同的国家利益或共同的发展议程，导致水资源管理成果不可持续； （c）四个LMB国家同意的水资源管理程序与Sadoff和Gray（2002，WaterPolicy，4，389）所定义的利益共享概念框架很好地吻合，尽管这些程序有可能促进更合作平等分享湄公河水资源带来的社会，经济和环境利益的议程，1995年《湄公河协定》的执行目前仍存在争议。湄公河委员会制定的五项水资源管理程序未取得令人满意的结果，部分原因是该机构缺乏监管权限。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号