...
首页> 外文期刊>Landscape research >A walk in the long grass: agriculture, aesthetics, and wildness on Hampstead Heath
【24h】

A walk in the long grass: agriculture, aesthetics, and wildness on Hampstead Heath

机译:在长长的草地上漫步:汉普斯特德荒地的农业,美学和荒野

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This article traces a battle over grass mowing and scrub clearance between local campaigners and land managers on London?s Hampstead Heath during the late 1970s. I discuss one of the key arguments in favour of maintaining long grass: its look of ?naturalness?, which effaced centuries of grazing by sheep and cattle, as well as the extensive land management that went into maintaining this ?wild? aesthetic. The 1978 conflict over scrub clearance resulted in a widely reported claim that 20 dead bodies were dumped on the Heath annually. Here, I consider the reality of the claim and the ways in which frictions between local actors point towards a fluid and constantly changing understanding of what is properly ?wild? and ?natural? on Hampstead Heath. The debate highlights the degree to which both management and historical narratives of public open spaces are the product of complex negotiation.
机译:本文追溯了1970年代后期伦敦汉普斯特德荒地(Hampstead Heath)上当地运动家与土地管理者之间关于割草和清理灌木丛的斗争。我讨论了维护长草的关键论点之一:它的“自然”外观消除了数百年来绵羊和牛的放牧,以及为维持这种“野生”而进行的广泛土地管理。美学。 1978年有关清除灌木的冲突导致了广泛报道,声称每年有20具尸体被丢弃在荒地上。在这里,我考虑了这一主张的现实,以及地方参与者之间的摩擦指向一种对什么是适当的“狂野”的不断变化和不断变化的理解的方式。和?自然?在汉普斯特德荒地。辩论强调了公共场所的管理和历史叙述在多大程度上是复杂谈判的产物。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号