...
首页> 外文期刊>Language, culture and curriculum >Corrective feedback and learner uptake in American ESL and Chinese EFL classrooms: A comparative study
【24h】

Corrective feedback and learner uptake in American ESL and Chinese EFL classrooms: A comparative study

机译:纠正反馈和学习者在美国ESL和中国EFL教室中的吸收:比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Instructional context plays a crucial role in the learning of a second/foreign language. The present study compared the occurrence of corrective feedback (CF) and learner uptake across two instructional contexts at the tertiary level: English as a second language (ESL) in the US and English as a foreign language (EFL) in China. Analysis of 36 h of observation data showed that (1) recast was the most preferred feedback type in both settings, but with a much higher percentage in the EFL lessons than in the ESL lessons; (2) the distribution of CF was similar in terms of emphasis but was significantly different in terms of linguistic focus; and (3) the overall frequencies of uptake and repair were close between the two settings, but the rates of uptake and repair following explicit correction were significantly higher in the EFL lessons than in the ESL lessons. These findings suggest that although teacher-student interactions across ESL and EFL settings demonstrate a common trend, CF and uptake are not context-free.
机译:教学背景在学习第二种/外语时发挥着至关重要的作用。本研究比较了大专院校的两个教学环境中的纠正反馈(CF)和学习者的发生:英语作为美国的第二语言(ESL),是中国的英语(EFL)。 36小时的观察数据分析表明(1)重量是两个设置中最优选的反馈类型,但在EFL课程中具有比ESL课程更高的百分比; (2)在强调方面,CF的分布在语言焦点方面具有显着差异; (3)在两个设置之间的摄取和修复的总体频率接近,但在EFL课程中显式校正后的摄取和修复的速度明显高于ESL课程。这些发现表明,虽然跨ESL和EFL设置的教师 - 学生交互展示了常见的趋势,但CF和摄取不是无与伦比的。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号