• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Leadership >Them and us: Did Democrat inclusiveness and Republican solidarity lead to the 2016 US presidential election outcome?
【24h】

Them and us: Did Democrat inclusiveness and Republican solidarity lead to the 2016 US presidential election outcome?

机译：他们与我们：民主党的包容性和共和党的团结是否导致了2016年美国总统大选的结果？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This research examined the role that group dynamics played in the 2016 US presidential election. Just prior to the election, participants were assessed on perceived self-similarity to group members’ views, perception of own leader’s prototypicality, perceptions of social values, and strength of support (attitudes). Results indicated that Democrats were more inclusive, seeing more similarity between themselves and members from the outgroup political party, while Republicans displayed more ingroup solidarity and negative attitudes toward outgroup members. Trump was viewed as a more prototypical leader by Republicans than Clinton was by Democrats. These results may help to explain the perhaps surprising fragility of Democrat voters’ support for Clinton.
机译：这项研究研究了群体动力在2016年美国总统大选中扮演的角色。就在选举之前，对参与者进行了以下评估：与小组成员意见的自我相似性，对领导者原型的看法，对社会价值的看法以及支持的力量（态度）。结果表明，民主党人更具包容性，他们与外党政党成员之间的相似性更高，而共和党则表现出了更多的党内团结和对外党成员的消极态度。与共和党人相比，特朗普被克林顿视为民主党的典型代表。这些结果可能有助于解释民主党选民对克林顿的支持可能令人惊讶的脆弱性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号