首页> 外文期刊>Library Computing >Searching for library and information science literature: A comparison of coverage in three databases
【24h】

Searching for library and information science literature: A comparison of coverage in three databases

机译:搜索图书馆和情报学文献:比较三个数据库的覆盖率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A study of the Dialog database versions of ISA and its close competitors, LISA and Library Literature & Information Science, characterized the coverage, overlap among the databases, and types of documents indexed in 1999 and early 2000. In 20 LIS subject searches, Library Literature retrieved the most records in 16 of the searches, Lisa had the most in three, and they tied in one. ISA had the least records for all topics, a natural result of adding significantly fewer records overall. For any subject, the maximum overlap of titles among the three databases was only 21%, indicating the need to search more than one database for comprehensive results.
机译:对ISA及其紧密竞争对手LISA和“图书馆文献与信息科学”的Dialog数据库版本进行的研究,确定了数据库的覆盖范围,重叠部分以及1999年和2000年初索引的文档类型。在20个LIS主题检索中,图书馆文献在16个搜索中检索到最多的记录,Lisa在3个搜索中最多,并且并列一个。 ISA的所有主题的记录最少,这是自然而然地增加了总数的记录的自然结果。对于任何主题,三个数据库中标题的最大重叠率仅为21%,这表明需要搜索多个数据库以获得全面结果。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Library Computing》 |2000年第2期|p.118-126|共9页
  • 作者单位

    The authors Eleanor J. Read is Assistant Professor/Social Science Data Services Librarian at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA. R. Craig Smith is Reference Librarian at Knox County Public Library System, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号