• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>The library >The Marriage of Philology and Scepticism: Uncertainty and Conjecture in Early Modern Scholarship and Thought
【24h】

The Marriage of Philology and Scepticism: Uncertainty and Conjecture in Early Modern Scholarship and Thought

机译：婚姻与怀疑的婚姻：早期现代奖学金和思想的不确定性与猜想

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

A CONFERENCE HELD IN 2012 gives rise to this various and well produced collection. A theme that might not, perhaps, serve to hold together a monograph with conviction nonetheless permits the collection of interesting, and sometimes important studies. Some contributions are fuller than others; some authors provide meditations on the volume's themes that arise from a career's various reading; other authors, by contrast, take advantage of the opportunity to present the results of substantial focused research. But the results are never less than interesting, and the collection is probably the better for no single strong editorial line having been imposed on how to understand the claims of scepticism in relation to philology. The chronological centre of gravity of the collection falls in the two centuries around the year 1600. But it opens with two preliminary offerings considering earlier moments. Glenn W. Most ('Sextus Empiricus, Child of the Marriage of Philology and Scepticisms') concisely considers the claims of Sextus Empiricus in relation to the volume's two themes, arriving at a reading of his Against the Grammarians which concludes that even Sextus does not really put philology into doubt, for he did not think it worth doing so. Of all the authors Jan M. Ziolkowski ('Medieval Precedents for Sceptical Philology') perhaps follows what he takes to be his brief most closely, not least in offering an intelligent and thought-provoking general introduction that the volume otherwise lacks. His reassessment of the possibility for medieval scepticism before scholasticism emphasizes the stimulus provided by St Augustine's preoccupation with refuting the 'academics' before turning to consider the case-studies of the Carolingian Abbot Lupus of Ferrieres (Servatus Lupus), whose unusual concern for collation and correction may perhaps-the author leaves the question open-be connected to his interest in obtaining a copy of Cicero's Academica, and the idiosyncratically academically sceptical, and also philological, John of Salisbury (who nonetheless did not know Cicero's Academica directly).
机译：2012年举行的会议导致这种各种各样的收藏品。可能不是，可能不会用于将专着持有信念的主题允许收集有趣，有时是重要的研究。一些贡献比其他贡献更饱满;一些作者提供了职业职业各种阅读的卷主题的冥想;相比之下，其他作者利用机会展示实质性重点研究的结果。但结果永远不会少于有趣，而且该系列对没有对语言持怀疑主义的索赔施加了如何施加的单一强烈编辑线。该收集的按时间级重心在1600年左右的两年内落下。但它与考虑早期时刻的两个初步筹集。 Glenn W.大多数（'Sextus Empiricus，婚姻的婚姻和令人欣然主义者）简明扼要地考虑了Sextus Empiricus的索赔与批量的两个主题，到达他对抗语法的阅读，这结论是甚至塞斯萨没有真的把语法放在怀疑，因为他不认为值得这样做。在所有作者中，Jan M. Ziolkowski（“持怀疑态度的中世纪先例”）也许是他最密切的是他的简短，尤其是在提供聪明和思想挑衅的一般介绍中，否则缺乏批量缺乏。他重新评估中世纪怀疑术前的可能性，在苏族主持中强调了圣奥古斯丁的刺激，并在转向审议Ferrieres（Servatus Lupus）的Carolingian Abbot Lupus的案例研究之前，他们对整理的案件和更正可能可能 - 作者将问题留下了开放的问题，以获得他的兴趣获取西塞罗的学院副本，以及特殊的学者持怀疑态度，以及索尔兹伯里的约翰（仍然不知道Cicero的Academica）。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The library》 |2021年第2期|233-235265|共4页
  • 作者

    RICHARD SERJEANTSON;

  • 作者单位

    Trinity College Cambridge;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号