...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Literature and Theology >Memorialising May 4, 1970 at Kent State University: Reflections on Collective Memory, Public Art and Religious Criticism1
【24h】

Memorialising May 4, 1970 at Kent State University: Reflections on Collective Memory, Public Art and Religious Criticism1

机译：1970年5月4日在肯特州立大学（Kent State University）举行纪念活动：对集体记忆，公共艺术和宗教批评的反思 1

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This essay explores the memorialising of the famous events of 4 May 1970, in which troops of the Ohio National Guard fired on demonstrators, killing four people and injuring nine. Despite the fact that the memorialisation process began almost immediately, in photographs, in popular song, in sculpture, in commemorative plaques and events, both the memory and the meaning of the events have been bitterly contested. Through the 1970s, and into the 1980s and beyond, individuals and groups called for a proper and official memorial to be made, while at the same time others criticised any effort to memorialise the events at all. Using Kent as a case study, and comparing it with the more recent case of the memorialisation of the Twin Towers attack on 9 September 2001, this argument considers the problems of commemoration, the limits of collective memory and the place of religious art—and thus religious meaning and religious criticism—in relation to public art and collective memory. In the end it suggests that, given the controversies surrounding both memorial sites, collective or public memory cannot depend on social consensus. Rather, it may rather be more fruitfully imagined, at least in American culture, as an interrogative, dialogical form of engagement, within one's self and with one's fellow citizens.
机译：本文探讨了1970年5月4日著名事件的纪念活动，其中俄亥俄州国民警卫队向示威者开火，造成4人丧生和9人受伤。尽管事实上纪念活动几乎是立即开始的，包括照片，流行歌曲，雕塑，纪念匾和事件，但事件的记忆和意义都遭到了激烈的争论。在整个1970年代，直到1980年代及以后，个人和团体都要求建立适当的官方纪念馆，与此同时，其他人则批评任何为纪念这些事件所做的任何努力。以肯特为例，并将其与最近纪念2001年9月9日双子塔袭击事件的案例进行比较，该论点考虑了纪念问题，集体记忆的局限性和宗教艺术的地位，因此也考虑了这一问题。宗教意义和宗教批评-与公共艺术和集体记忆有关。最后，它表明，考虑到围绕两个纪念馆的争议，集体或公共记忆不能取决于社会共识。更确切地说，至少在美国文化中，它可能是人们自身和与同胞之间的一种询问性，对话形式的交往形式。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Literature and Theology》 |2006年第4期|424-437|共14页
  • 作者

    Mark W. Graham;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Religious Studies The College of Wooster 1189 Beall Avenue Wooster OH 44691 USA.;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号