...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Angelaki: Journal of the Theoretical Humanities >AFFIRMATIVE BIOPOLITICS AND HUMAN NATURE IN FRANCO BASAGLIA’S THOUGHT
【24h】

AFFIRMATIVE BIOPOLITICS AND HUMAN NATURE IN FRANCO BASAGLIA’S THOUGHT

机译：法兰西·巴萨利亚思想体系中的友善生物政治与人类自然

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In this article, I contend that Franco Basaglia’s work of reform in psychiatry can be read as a proposal for an affirmative biopolitical psychiatry. My claim is that Basaglia’s reform is to be regarded not only as a successful dismantling of the old disciplinary psychiatry but also as an ante litteram attempt at preventing what Pierangelo Di Vittorio refers to as a “biopolitical psychiatry.” Di Vittorio’s definition is notably limited, for he seems to overlook Foucault’s conceptual oscillations between affirmative biopolitics and negative biopower. Di Vittorio’s biopolitical psychiatry does not bear any affirmative connotation, and his radically negative perspective should rather be considered as the exertion of biopower in psychiatry, as a negative involution of an affirmative biopolitical psychiatry. I propose to read Basaglia’s entire work of reform, which can be summarised by his famous motto “bracketing mental illness” - that is, disregarding the patient’s diagnosis - as an affirmative biopolitical psychiatry. I suggest that biopolitical psychiatry cannot be understood only in negative terms, as Di Vittorio does, and that Basaglia did not propose to oppose its emergence; rather, he actively fought against disciplinary psychiatry. Basaglia’s reform does not prevent psychiatry from being one of the dispositifs of biopolitics, that is, one of the possible means through which political power reaches the lives of people: for him, this prevention might be impossible or even undesirable. On the other hand, it would preclude psychiatry from becoming a dispositif of biopower, one that would ultimately bring life under such strict control that it would degenerate into a thanatopolitical implosion.View full textDownload full textKeywordsBasaglia, affirmative biopolitical psychiatry, clinic of lack, human nature, EspositoRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0969725X.2011.621223
机译：在本文中，我认为佛朗哥·巴萨里亚（Franco Basaglia）的精神病学改革工作可以被视为对积极的生物政治精神病学的建议。我的主张是，Basaglia的改革不仅被视为成功地消除了旧的纪律精神病学，而且还被视为防止Pie Pielo Di Vittorio称之为“生物政治精神病学”的事前尝试。迪维托里奥的定义受到很大限制，因为他似乎忽略了福柯在肯定生物政治与否定生物权力之间的概念波动。迪维托里奥的生物政治精神病学没有任何肯定的涵义，他的根本消极观点应被视为是生物力量在精神病学中的作用，是对肯定生物政治精神病学的消极消退。我建议阅读巴萨里亚的整个改革工作，可以概括为他著名的座右铭：“包围精神疾病”，即无视患者的诊断，认为这是一种肯定的生物政治精神病学。我建议，不能像迪维托里奥那样，仅从消极的角度来理解生物政治精神病学，而巴萨利亚则没有提议反对它的出现。相反，他积极反对纪律精神病学。 Basaglia的改革并未阻止精神病学成为生物政治学的特征之一，也就是说，这是政治权力影响人们生活的可能手段之一：对他而言，这种预防可能是不可能的，甚至是不可取的。另一方面，它会阻止精神病学成为生物力量的沉积物，最终将使生命置于如此严格的控制之下，以至于它会退化成政治上的内爆。查看全文下载全文关键词性质，EspositoRelated var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand：“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”，servicescompact：“ citeulike，netvibes，twitter，technorati，delicious，linkedin，facebook，stumbleupon，digg，google，更多”，发布：“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”} ;添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0969725X.2011.621223

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号