首页> 外文期刊>Measurement >Not All Authorships Are Created Equal
【24h】

Not All Authorships Are Created Equal

机译:并非所有著作权都是平等的

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Describing, explaining, and discussing various modern indices of scholarly impact as accom plished by Ruscio, Seaman, D'Oriano, Stremlo, and Mahalchik (this issue) is highly commend-able, as such measures get increasingly important in hiring and promotion decisions. Thus they should be described, discussed, and improved. And I agree with almost all points made in the tar get article, except the treatment of shared authorship. It is argued there that adjustments for shared authorship probably would not improve these measures much, if at all. That claim is justified by showing that the rank order of measured scholarly impact is highly consistent, with correlations from .79 to .91, for a sample of authors across 4 methods to partition publication credit between authors (same credit to all authors, double credit for first author, linearly declining credit, and harmonically declining credit).
机译:Ruscio,Seaman,D'Oriano,Stremlo和Mahalchik(本期杂志)提出的描述,解释和讨论各种学术影响力的现代指标是值得高度赞扬的,因为此类措施在雇用和晋升决策中变得越来越重要。因此,应该对其进行描述,讨论和改进。我同意tar get文章中几乎所有要点,除了共享作者权的处理。有人认为,对共享作者身份的调整可能根本不会改善这些措施。通过证明作者对4种在作者之间划分发表学分的方法(所有学分相同,双重学分)采用4种方法对作者进行抽样,可以证明所测学术影响的排名顺序高度一致(从0.79到.91的相关性),从而证明了这一说法是合理的。 (对于第一作者,线性下降信用,而谐和下降信用)。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Measurement》 |2012年第4期|147-148|共2页
  • 作者

    Peter Borkenau;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Psychology, Martin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, 06099 Halle, Germany;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号