...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Measurement >Adapting Measurement to the Demands of Test-Based Accountability: Rejoinder to Commentaries
【24h】

Adapting Measurement to the Demands of Test-Based Accountability: Rejoinder to Commentaries

机译：使度量适应基于测试的问责制的要求：重新加入注释

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

My goal in writing Adapting Educational Measurement to the Demands of Test-Based Accountability was to help spark a useful debate in the testing community. The thoughtful commentaries offered to date are therefore gratifying. In different forms, Kane, Thissen, and Braun all argue that altering the practices of testing will be insufficient and that we need to rethink the ways in which tests are used for accountability. Kane, for example, wrote that "rather than adapt educational measurement to the demands of accountability, I think that we should argue for school and teacher evaluation systems that recognize the limitations of standardized tests as instruments of policy." Thissen concurs and argues that the weight placed on a single test score is inconsistent with the Standards. Braun argues that we need a system that lessens the incentives to inflate scores. I could not agree more strongly and have often made similar arguments. Indeed, when addressing policy audiences, I've argued that improvements to testing, while important, are less important than changing the accountability system into which they are embedded. I deliberately restricted my paper to matters within the purview of the field, but I am grateful to Kane, Thissen, and Braun for placing my narrower discussion into its proper context.
机译：我编写适应于基于考试的问责制的教育衡量标准的目的是帮助在考试界引发一场有益的辩论。因此，迄今为止提供的周到评论令人满足。凯恩（Kane），Thissen和布劳恩（Braun）都以不同的形式辩称，改变测试的实践将是不够的，我们需要重新考虑使用测试进行问责的方式。例如，凯恩（Kane）写道：“我认为，与其让教育衡量方法适应问责制的要求，不如说我们应该主张将标准考试的局限性视为政策手段的学校和教师评估系统。” Thissen同意这一观点，并认为单个测试分数的权重与标准不一致。布劳恩（Braun）认为，我们需要一种能够减少提高分数的动机的系统。我不能更坚决地同意，而且经常提出类似的论点。确实，在向政策对象演讲时，我认为测试的改进虽然很重要，但不如更改嵌入测试的问责制重要。我特意将论文限制在该领域的范围内，但我感谢凯恩（Kane），Thissen和布劳恩（Braun）将我的讨论范围缩小到适当的范围。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Measurement》 |2015年第4期|189-194|共6页
  • 作者

    Daniel Koretz;

  • 作者单位

    Harvard Graduate School of Education, 415 Gutman Library, Cambridge, MA 02138;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号