首页> 外文期刊>Michigan Academician >G. Mermen Williams and Rhodesian Independence: A Case Study in Bureaucratic Politics
【24h】

G. Mermen Williams and Rhodesian Independence: A Case Study in Bureaucratic Politics

机译:G. Mermen Williams和罗得西亚独立:官僚政治的个案研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The United States government demonstrated consistent interest in the problems of the Central African Federation and the issue of Rhodesian independence, but its approach to these problems was not homogenous. U.S. policy can be seen as the result of compromise and conflict between different sections of the bureaucracy that competed to advance interpretations of how best to serve the national interest. There were sharp differences of opinion between policymakers on the degree of support to give the British government and Zambia as a consequence of Rhodesia's UDI, but ultimately the advocates of a minimalist strategy prevailed. Several factors explain why the views of the Bureau of African Affairs were marginalized, but most significant among these was the inability of G. Mennen Williams to exert sufficient leverage with President Johnson, partly as a result of a clouded personal history and partly because the president had little interest in African affairs. Against this background, and with his ambitions to return to state politics, Williams's decision to resign is easily understood.
机译:美国政府对中非联盟的问题和罗得西亚独立性问题表现出一贯的兴趣,但美国对这些问题的处理方式并不统一。美国政策可以看作是官僚机构不同部门之间妥协与冲突的结果,这些部门竞相就如何最好地为国家利益服务的方式进行解释。在政策制定者之间,由于罗得西亚的UDI而给予英国政府和赞比亚的支持程度存在着截然不同的观点,但最终还是主张了极简主义。有几个因素可以解释为什么非洲事务局的观点被边缘化,但是其中最重要的是门尼·威廉姆斯(G. Mennen Williams)无法与约翰逊总统发挥足够的影响力,部分原因是个人历史阴云密布,部分原因是总统对非洲事务没什么兴趣。在这种背景下,并怀着重返州政的野心,威廉姆斯辞职的决定很容易理解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号