...
首页> 外文期刊>Military review >Expanding Tolstoy and Shrinking Dostoyevsky How Russian Actions in the Information Space are Inverting Doctrinal Paradigms of Warfare
【24h】

Expanding Tolstoy and Shrinking Dostoyevsky How Russian Actions in the Information Space are Inverting Doctrinal Paradigms of Warfare

机译:扩大托尔斯泰和缩小陀思妥耶夫斯基俄国在信息领域的行动如何颠覆了战争学说范式

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In April 2003, as American tanks thundered into Baghdad, Mohammed Saeed al-Sahhaf, Iraq's information minister (derisively known as "Baghdad Bob"), vehemently broadcasted denials of an American presence in Iraq while simultaneously forecasting wild predictions of American defeat and destruction. Obviously discredited by the reality of events on the ground, Baghdad Bob viscerally illustrates the limits of IO in the face of overwhelming combat power. While many such as Gerasimov have boldly predicted that modern forms of war will supplant decisive combat, nothing in the history of humanity and war validates this prediction. Even in the face of Russian IO overmatch, the U.S. joint force should not sacrifice lethal combat capabilities or, worse, notions of liberal democratic ideals to match Russian actions stride for stride in the information space. Rather, by steadfastly adopting a doctrine of contested acknowledgment, the joint force can pragmatically face the realities of Russian IO applications in the operational environment while simultaneously degrading them and, in this way, preserving American ideals while defending American interests.
机译:2003年4月,当美国坦克轰炸巴格达时,伊拉克情报部长穆罕默德·赛义德·萨哈夫(原名“巴格达·鲍勃”)强烈地否认了美国在伊拉克的存在,同时还预言了有关美国战败和毁灭的疯狂预言。巴格达·鲍勃显然对实地事件的真实性不屑一顾,在面对压倒性战斗力的情况下,清晰地说明了IO的局限性。尽管许多人,例如格拉西莫夫(Gerasimov)大胆地预测,现代战争形式将取代决定性的战斗,但在人类历史和战争史上,没有任何证据可以证明这一预测。即使面对俄罗斯的IO过度竞争,美国的联合部队也不应牺牲致命的战斗能力,更糟糕的是,要与俄罗斯的行动相匹配的自由民主理想的观念在信息领域大步向前。相反,通过坚定不移地采用有争议的承认原则,联合部队可以在作战环境中务实地面对俄罗斯IO应用程序的现实,同时对其进行降级,从而在维护美国理想的同时捍卫美国利益。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Military review》 |2017年第5期|39-47|共9页
  • 作者

    Scott J. Harr;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号