...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Military review >Strykers on the Mechanized Battlefield
【24h】

Strykers on the Mechanized Battlefield

机译：机械化战场上的弦

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

On a dusty morning in July 2015, a combined Stryker-Abrams battalion task force surged across the high desert of the National Training Center (NTC) at Fort Irwin, California, toward two mountain passes. The Strykers fell behind the tracked light armor was no match for the main gun rounds from enemy tanks combined with the cannon fire from enemy infantry fighting vehicles. Few Strykers survived the engagement in the open ground against the heavier enemy force, and that engagement blunted the spearhead of the brigades attack. In the aftermath of this defeat, it is likely that many of those involved were asking themselves: Is there a better way to employ the Stryker? That question was not new, of course. In the early days of the Stryker, critics observed that "it does not provide the firepower or the protection to transform army light infantry units into a 'medium weight force.'" Given the Stryker's inherent limitations, how should it be employed against a mechanized opponent? And, fifteen years after the introduction of the Stryker brigade combat team (BCT), has the Army determined its role on the battlefield? Going forward, it will be useful to see how Strykers operate as part of a true combined force. The Army has yet to conduct a full-scale division-sized training exercise pairing an Armored BCT with a Stryker BCT to test how both organizations can best use their strengths. Lanza noted that the idea has been surfaced at the highest levels: "One of the things we were discussing is: should we have a hybrid rotation?" An exercise of this type would allow the Army to test theories about interoperability between the different types of brigades that have yet to be seen outside of war games and command post exercises. It might also finally resolve the role of the Stryker in combined arms maneuver, which has been, to this point, an open question.
机译：在2015年7月一个尘土飞扬的早晨，一支由斯特赖克·阿布拉姆斯（Stryker-Abrams）营组成的特遣队在加利福尼亚州欧文堡的国家培训中心（NTC）的高空沙漠中奔赴两处山口。斯特瑞克人落后于追踪到的轻装甲，这与敌方坦克的主炮弹和敌方步兵战车的加农炮射击无法比拟。很少斯崔克人在空战中幸存下来，抵抗了较重的敌军，而这种战斗使旅的进攻矛头变得钝了。在这场失败的后果之后，许多参与其中的人很可能会问自己：是否有更好的雇佣斯特赖克的方法？当然，这个问题并不新鲜。在“斯特赖克”的早期，批评家注意到“它没有提供将火力轻步兵部队转变为'中等重量部队'的火力或防护。”鉴于斯特赖克的固有局限性，应如何将其用于机械化对手？而且，在引进斯特赖克旅战斗队（BCT）十五年之后，陆军是否已确定其在战场上的作用？展望未来，了解斯瑞克如何作为真正的联合部队的一部分进行作战将很有用。陆军尚未进行全面的师级训练演习，将装甲BCT和Stryker BCT配对使用，以测试这两个组织如何最好地利用其优势。 Lanza指出，这个想法已在最高层次浮出水面：“我们正在讨论的问题之一是：我们应该进行混合轮换吗？”这种类型的演习将使陆军能够测试关于在战争游戏和指挥所演习之外尚未见到的不同类型旅之间的互操作性的理论。它可能最终也解决了斯特赖克在联合武器机动中的作用，到目前为止，这是一个悬而未决的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号