...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Military review >Does the Army Training Strategy Train to Fail?
【24h】

Does the Army Training Strategy Train to Fail?

机译：陆军训练策略会训练失败吗？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The U.S. Army spends a vast amount of energy, resources, and time on training, perpetually seeking improvements to forge a better force. The latest Army Training Strategy (October 2012) tasks our Army to "hold commanders responsible for training units and developing leaders through the development and execution of progressive, challenging, and realistic training."2 This implies a shared understanding of what training is realistic, and what is not. Although our training strategy employs the terms "training realism," "replication," "operational relevant training," and "adaptive" throughout the short document, it never defines or differentiates this lexicon. Without any contextual depth in these myriad concepts, is it possible that due to fundamental flaws in our training strategy we are unaware when we conduct unrealistic training instead? In other words, do we train to fail?
机译：美国陆军在训练上花费了大量的精力，资源和时间，一直在寻求改进以组建一支更好的部队。最新的陆军训练策略（2012年10月）要求我军“通过制定和执行渐进式，挑战性和现实性训练，让指挥官对训练单位负责，并发展领导者。” 2这意味着对什么训练是现实的有共同的认识，什么不是。尽管我们的培训策略在整个简短文档中都采用了“培训现实主义”，“复制”，“业务相关培训”和“自适应”等术语，但它从未定义或区分此词典。在这些无数的概念中没有任何上下文的深度，是否有可能由于我们培训策略中的根本缺陷而没有意识到当我们进行不切实际的培训时呢？换句话说，我们是否训练失败？

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号