...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Military technology >Direct Assault Support of Expeditionary Interventions
【24h】

Direct Assault Support of Expeditionary Interventions

机译：直接攻击远征干预措施的支持

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The execution of an expeditionary military intervention is rightly considered one of the most difficult and challenging of all operations. Expeditionary operations are a risky affair, yet projecting military power and influence far from one's home country is recognized as a mark of global influence and an essential tool of global geopolitics. The United States and - to a lesser degree, both France and the United Kingdom - have expeditionary capabilities. Now, however, they are being joined by both the Russian Federation and the Peoples Republic of China (PRC). Russia's presence today in Syria could scarcely have happened even at the height of the Soviet Empire. While Russia is re-establishing its airborne forces, the PRC is focused on building amphibious assault and ground forces optimized to operate on its peripherals, designed to extend its physical presence and challenge or even pre-empt moves by those seeking to contravene their perceived interests. Yet these forces are decidedly different in structure, equipment and tactical employment, with a unique emphasis on mechanization and particularly the introduction of armoured vehicles to provide direct assault support in expeditionary scenarios.
机译：执行远例军事干预的执行是正确的，被认为是所有业务最困难和最具挑战性的。远征行动是一种冒犯的冒险，但投影军事力量和远离一个祖国的影响被认为是全球影响力的标志，是全球地理位置的重要工具。美国和 - 在较小的程度上，法国和英国 - 有远征能力。然而，现在，他们正在被俄罗斯联邦和中华民国（中国人民）加入。俄罗斯今天在叙利亚的存在甚至在苏联帝国的高度甚至可能发生了几乎没有发生过。虽然俄罗斯正在重建空中力量，但中国专注于建设两栖攻击，而是优化的地基，旨在扩大其实际存在和挑战，甚至是寻求违反其感知利益的人员的预防措施。然而，这些力量在结构，设备和战术就业方面具有明显不同，具有独特的强调机械化，特别是引入装甲车辆，以便在远征场景中提供直接攻击支持。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号