• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Minds and Machines >Embodying Emotions: What Emotion Theorists Can Learn From Simulations Of Emotions
【24h】

Embodying Emotions: What Emotion Theorists Can Learn From Simulations Of Emotions

机译：体现情感：情感理论家可以从情感模拟中学到什么

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Cognitively-oriented theories have dominated the recent history of the study of emotion. However, critics of this perspective suggest the role of the body in the experience of emotion is largely ignored by cognitive theorists. As an alternative to the cognitive perspective, critics are increasingly pointing to William James' theory, which emphasized somatic aspects of emotions. This emerging emphasis on the embodiment of emotions is shared by those in the field of AI attempting to model human emotions. Behavior-based agents in AI are attempts to model the role the body might play in the experiencing of emotions. Progress in creating such behavior-based models that function in their environments has been slow, suggesting some potential problems with Jamesian alternatives to cognitive perspectives of emotions. Heidegger's and Merleau-Ponty's conceptions of embodiment are suggested as alternatives to James' and as means for addressing the shortcomings of the cognitive perspective.
机译：以认知为导向的理论主导了情感研究的最新历史。但是，这种观点的批评者认为，身体在情感体验中的作用在很大程度上被认知理论家所忽略。作为认知观点的替代方法，批评家越来越多地指出威廉·詹姆斯的理论，该理论强调情绪的身体方面。 AI领域中试图对人类情感建模的人们越来越强调情感的体现。 AI中基于行为的主体正在尝试对人体在情绪体验中可能扮演的角色进行建模。建立这种在环境中起作用的基于行为的模型的进展很缓慢，这表明詹姆士主义替代情绪的认知观点存在一些潜在的问题。建议将海德格尔和梅洛-庞蒂的体现概念作为对詹姆斯理论的替代，并作为解决认知观点缺陷的手段。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号