首页> 外文期刊>Minerva >Accounting for Impact? The Journal Impact Factor and the Making of Biomedical Research in the Netherlands
【24h】

Accounting for Impact? The Journal Impact Factor and the Making of Biomedical Research in the Netherlands

机译:考虑影响?荷兰的期刊影响因子与生物医学研究的发展

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The range and types of performance metrics has recently proliferated in academic settings, with bibliometric indicators being particularly visible examples. One field that has traditionally been hospitable towards such indicators is biome-dicine. Here the relative merits of bibliometrics are widely discussed, with debates often portraying them as heroes or villains. Despite a plethora of controversies, one of the most widely used indicators in this field is said to be the Journal Impact Factor (JIF). In this article we argue that much of the current debates around researchers' uses of the JIF in biomedicine can be classed as 'folk theories': explanatory accounts told among a community that seldom (if ever) get systematically checked. Such accounts rarely disclose how knowledge production itself becomes more-or-less consolidated around the JIF. Using ethnographic materials from different research sites in Dutch University Medical Centers, this article sheds new empirical and theoretical light on how performance metrics variously shape biomedical research on the 'shop floor.' Our detailed analysis underscores a need for further research into the constitutive effects of evaluative metrics.
机译:绩效指标的范围和类型最近在学术环境中激增,文献计量指标是特别明显的例子。传统上对此类指标热情好客的领域是生物医学。在这里,文献计量学的相对优点被广泛讨论,辩论经常将它们描述为英雄还是反派。尽管存在许多争议,但该领域使用最广泛的指标之一是期刊影响因子(JIF)。在本文中,我们认为,当前有关研究人员在生物医学中使用JIF的许多争论都可以归类为“民间理论”:在社区中,很少有(如果有的话)对解释性陈述进行系统地检查。这样的描述很少揭示知识生产本身是如何围绕JIF进行整合的。本文使用来自荷兰大学医学中心不同研究地点的人种志资料,为绩效指标如何塑造“车间”生物医学研究提供了新的经验和理论依据。我们的详细分析强调需要对评估指标的本构效应进行进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号