首页> 外文期刊>Modern Italy >‘Experts in truth?’: the politics of retribution in Italy and the role of historians1 1. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the Conference on ‘Historical Justice and Historical Truth from the Perspective of the Victims’, University of Berne, 28-30 August 2008, organised by Marina Cattaruzza, Lukas Meyer and Regula Ludi. View all notes
【24h】

‘Experts in truth?’: the politics of retribution in Italy and the role of historians1 1. An earlier version of this paper was presented at the Conference on ‘Historical Justice and Historical Truth from the Perspective of the Victims’, University of Berne, 28-30 August 2008, organised by Marina Cattaruzza, Lukas Meyer and Regula Ludi. View all notes

机译:“真理专家”:意大利的报应政治和历史学家的角色1 1.从“视角下的历史正义与历史真相”会议上提出了本文的早期版本由玛丽娜·卡塔鲁扎(Marina Cattaruzza),卢卡斯·迈耶(Lukas Meyer)和雷古拉·鲁迪(Regula Ludi)组织的伯尔尼大学受害者研究中心,2008年8月28-30日。查看所有笔记

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There have been many reflections on the relations between the judge and the historian which have concentrated on the differences between these two figures: but what happens in cases where an historian collaborates openly with a judge as an expert consultant? What happens when an investigative office, or a court, asks an historian to reconstruct an event which is subject to a judicial procedure, or when he or she has to pronounce the ‘last word’ on an event or a document? Or, in another possible scenario, what happens when a community asks an historian to pronounce on what happened in the past, in order to ascertain which, between two contesting memories of the representation of an event, is the one which corresponds to what ‘really happened’? In these cases historians are sought out to establish the truth-their professional skills as ‘truth experts’ are called upon. And there is an extraordinary faith that the truth will be discovered. The author reflects on these issues, using as a starting point his own personal experiences as a consultant in some recent Italian war-crimes trials.View full textDownload full textKeywordsjudge and historians, trials, war crimes, transitional justiceRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13532944.2010.491957
机译:关于法官与历史学家之间的关系,有很多反思都集中在这两个数字之间的差异上:但是,如果历史学家与法官作为专家顾问进行公开合作,会发生什么呢?当调查办公室或法院要求历史学家重建受司法程序管辖的事件时,或者他或她必须在事件或文档中说出“最后一句话”时,会发生什么情况?或者,在另一种可能的情况下,当社区要求历史学家对过去发生的事情发表意见时,会发生什么情况,以确定在事件表示的两个相互竞争的记忆中,哪个对应于–真的发生了吗?在这些情况下,历史学家被要求建立真相,他们的专业技能被称为“真相专家”。并且有一种非凡的信念,那就是事实将被发现。作者以自己在最近一些意大利战争罪行审判中作为顾问的个人经验为出发点,对这些问题进行了反思。查看全文下载全文关键词法官和历史学家,审判,战争罪行,过渡时期司法相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,services_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13532944.2010.491957

著录项

  • 来源
    《Modern Italy》 |2010年第3期|p.349-363|共15页
  • 作者

    Paolo Pezzinoa*;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号