It has often been said that eyewitness testimony in a court of law can get a person executed. This is quite true. Many ask, "…. If you can be convicted of a crime on personal testimony, then why can't that suffice for proving the existence of a UFO?" The reason is that science requires a far more exacting standard than the law. Scientific proof requires repeatable experiments, testable material, and peer-reviewed observations.rnThe vast majority of our data is personal testimony. We can only hope that this will lead to the type of evidence necessary to meet the exacting requirements of science. Therefore we must be able to present the best and most scientifically documented data possible in order to one day discover the nature of the enigmatic UFO phenomena.rnI believe that many within this organization would agree that to finally be able to prove the origin of UFOs may quite possibly be the most important discovery in the history of mankind. To that end, data collection, analysis and a great deal of perseverance are the keys that will one day provide the answers we all seek.
展开▼
