• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>NanoEthics >Generative Critique in Interdisciplinary Collaborations: From Critique in and of the Neurosciences to Socio-Technical Integration Research as a Practice of Critique in R(R)I
【24h】

Generative Critique in Interdisciplinary Collaborations: From Critique in and of the Neurosciences to Socio-Technical Integration Research as a Practice of Critique in R(R)I

机译：在跨学科合作中的生成批评：从神经科学的批评到社会技术融合研究，作为R（R）I的批评实践

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Discourses on Responsible Innovation and Responsible Research and Innovation, in short R(R)I, have revolved around but not elaborated on the notion of critique. In this article, generative critique is introduced to R(R)I as a practice that sits in-between adversarial armchair critique and co-opted, uncritical service. How to position oneself and be positioned on this spectrum has puzzled humanities scholars and social scientists who engage in interdisciplinary collaborations with scientists, engineers, and other professionals. Recently, generative critique has been presented as a solution to the puzzle in interdisciplinary collaborations on neuroscientific experiments. Generative critique seeks to create connections across disciplines that help remake seemingly stable objects in moments when taken-for-granted ways of seeing and approaching objects are unsettled. In order to translate generative critique from the neurosciences to R(R)I, socio-technical integration research (STIR) is proposed as a practice of generative critique in interdisciplinary R(R)I collaborations. These collaborations aim to account for societal aspects in research and technology development. For this purpose, a variety of approaches have been developed, including STIR and video-reflexive ethnography (VRE). STIR and VRE resemble each other but diverge on affective, collaborative, and temporal dimensions. Their juxtaposition serves to develop suggestions for how STIR could be modified on these dimensions to better enact generative critique in interdisciplinary R(R)I collaborations. In this way, the article contributes to ongoing discussions in R(R)I and in the engaged programme in science and technology studies more broadly on the dynamics of positioning in collaborative work.
机译：关于负责任的创新和负责任的研究和创新的话语，简而言之，我已经旋转了，但没有详细阐述了批评的概念。在本文中，将生成批评引入R（R）I作为坐在对抗扶手椅批评和共同选择的非批判性服务之间的实践。如何定位自己并定位在这一频谱上，令人憎恶的人文学者和社会科学家与科学家，工程师和其他专业人士参与跨学科合作。最近，生成批评已作为神经科学实验的跨学科合作中的谜题的解决方案。生成批评旨在创建跨学科的联系，以便在被授予的看到和接近物体的观看和接近物体的方式令人难以置信时，有助于重拍看似稳定的物体。为了将生成批评从神经科学转化为R（R）I，社会技术整合研究（搅拌）被提出作为跨学科R（R）的生成批评的做法。这些合作旨在考虑研究和技术发展中的社会方面。为此目的，已经开发了各种方法，包括搅拌和视频反应性民族识别（VRE）。搅拌和vere彼此相似，但在情感，协作和时间尺寸上偏离。它们的并置旨在制定如何在这些尺寸上修改搅拌以更好地在跨学科R（R）的合作中制定生成批评的建议。通过这种方式，本文有助于讨论r（r）我和在协同工作中定位动态的科学和技术研究中的参与计划。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号