...
首页> 外文期刊>Natural language & linguistic theory >Multiple (coordinated) (free) relatives
【24h】

Multiple (coordinated) (free) relatives

机译:多个(协调的)(免费)亲戚

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Building on the existing crosslinguistic research on wh-questions with coordinated wh-pronouns, in this paper we turn to relative clauses and examine the effects of coordination on the grammaticality of relative clauses with multiple relative pronouns. We first discuss a general restriction on relativization, which bans multiple relativization from a single clause. We attribute this restriction to either a syntactic violation (impossible promotion of the head) or a semantic violation (semantic mismatch between the head and the relative clause). Next, we turn to free and headed relatives with coordinated wh-pronouns, showing that they do not display the same amount of crosslinguistic variation as wh-questions with coordinated wh-pronouns. In particular, irrespective of the availability of a mono-clausal structure for wh-questions with coordinated wh-pronouns in a language (which in turn correlates with the availability of multiple wh-fronting), a mono-clausal structure for free relatives with coordinated wh-pronouns is not available. In this respect, free relatives pattern with headed relatives rather than wh-questions. We derive this parallelism from a fundamental difference between relative clauses and questions: the presence of a CP external head in relative clauses, but not in wh-questions.
机译:在现有的带协调代词的疑问句跨语言研究的基础上,本文转向关系从句,考察协调对具有多个相对代词的关系从句语法的影响。我们首先讨论对相对化的一般限制,该限制从单个子句中禁止多重相对化。我们将此限制归因于句法违规(不可能提升头)或语义违规(头与相对从句之间的语义不匹配)。接下来,我们转向带有协调代词的自由和亲戚亲属,这表明他们的交叉语言变异与协调代词的wh问题的表现不同。尤其是,不管是否存在针对带有语言中协调的代词的wh疑问句的单子句结构(这又与多个wh前置词的可用性相关),针对自由亲属的具有协调的wh代词的单句结构wh代词不可用。在这方面,自由亲戚与团长的亲戚在一起,而不是问问题。我们从相对从句和问题之间的根本区别得出这种并行性:相对从句中存在CP外部头,而在问句中则没有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号