首页> 外文期刊>Nature >Too good to be true
【24h】

Too good to be true

机译:难以置信

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We have all had the experience of having what seemed like a great idea, only to find that it wouldn't do, because it was contradicted by a familiar fact or suffered from an incurable logical error. The experience prompts the question: what was the cleverest idea in the history of science that turned out to be wrong? Before you try to answer this question, let me insist that by 'wrong' I mean really wrong. I won't accept 'Newton's laws of motion' as an answer. I understand that physicists nowadays insist that his laws break down at very high velocities and accelerations. As an ex-engineer whose aeroplanes never flew faster than sound, let alone light, I have great faith in Newton's laws: they are not so much 'wrong' as true subject to certain constraints. For the same reason, I would not accept 'Mendel's laws' as an answer either, even though the law of independent assortment is false for genes on the same chromosome. I want an idea that is wrong in all circumstances, but which deserves to be right.
机译:我们所有人都有过一个似乎是个好主意的经验,只是发现它不会做,因为它与一个熟悉的事实相矛盾或遭受了无法治愈的逻辑错误。经验引发了一个问题:科学史上最聪明的想法被证明是错误的?在您尝试回答这个问题之前,让我坚持认为“错”是指真的错。我不会接受“牛顿运动定律”作为答案。我知道当今的物理学家坚持认为他的定律以很高的速度和加速度被破坏。作为一名工程师,飞机的飞行速度从来没有比声音飞快,更不用说光了,我对牛顿定律充满信心:它们并不是“错误”的,而是受某些约束的真实情况。出于同样的原因,即使同一染色体上基因的独立分类法是错误的,我也不会接受“孟德尔定律”作为答案。我想要一个在所有情况下都是错误的想法,但是应该是正确的。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Nature》 |1999年第6741期|p.223|共1页
  • 作者

    John Maynard Smith;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 自然科学总论;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利