Scientific experts: more attention needed

Peter Fenn; Christopher Speck; Michael OShea

首页> 外文期刊>Nature >Scientific experts: more attention needed

【24h】

Scientific experts: more attention needed

机译：科学专家：需要更多关注

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

A survey of members of the legal profession Involved in cases requiring the use of scientific experts reveals strong support for court-appointed experts — but little evidence of direct experience to back up this feeling. In English law, the general rule covering the appearance of witnesses in court cases is that their testimony must be restricted to facts, and that tribunals should not be subject to their personal views and opinions. There are, however, many occasions on which the tribunal lacks the ability to form an opinion on its own on the evidence presented to it. Judges are not polymaths, and where the issue under consideration is one of science (or art), assistance from an expert may be required. As a result, English courts have recognized the need for special witnesses who are able to provide evidence on both fact and opinion.

机译：对涉及需要使用科学专家的案件的法律专业人士进行的一项调查显示，对法院任命的专家的支持很强，但很少有直接经验支持这种感觉的证据。在英国法律中，涵盖证人出庭的一般规则是，证人的证词必须仅限于事实，而法庭不应服从其个人观点和见解。但是，在许多情况下，法庭缺乏根据提出的证据自行形成意见的能力。法官不是多学科专家，如果所考虑的问题是科学（或艺术）之一，则可能需要专家的协助。结果，英国法院已经意识到需要能够提供事实和观点证据的特别证人。

著录项

来源
《Nature》 |1995年第6558期|p.754|共1页
作者
Peter Fenn; Christopher Speck; Michael OShea;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类自然科学总论;
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. From practical men to scientific experts: British veterinary surgeons and the development of government scientific expertise, c. 1878-1919 [J] . Woods A. History of Science: A Review of Literature and Research in the History of Science, Medicine and Technology in Its Intellectual and Social Context . 2013,第4aPta173期

机译：从实际的人到科学专家：英国兽医和政府科学专门知识的发展; c。 1878-1919年
2. Critique of the article by Visser and Jehan (200934. Visser, J. and Jehan, Z. 2009. ADHD: A scientific fact or a factual opinion? A critique of the veracity of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties , 14(2): 127-40. [Taylor & Francis Online]View all references): âADHD: a scientific fact or a factual opinion? A critique of the veracity of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorderâ [J] . Linda Wheelera* Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties . 2010,第3期

机译：Visser and Jehan（200934. Visser，J. and Jehan，Z. 2009.对注意力缺陷多动症：科学事实还是事实意见的批评？对注意力缺陷多动障碍的准确性的批评。情绪和行为困难，14（14）。 2）：127-40 [泰勒和弗朗西斯在线]查看所有参考文献）：“注意力缺陷多动症：是科学事实还是事实意见？对注意力缺陷多动障碍的准确性的批评
3. SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE ON ANTARCTIC RESEARCH LIFE SCIENCES STANDING SCIENTIFIC GROUP'S GROUP OF EXPERTS ON BIRDS, MINUTES OF MEETING, 18-22 JULY 2004, 'T HORNTJE, TEXEL, NETHERLANDS [J] . Marine Ornithology . 2004,第2期

机译：南极研究生命科学科学委员会代表科学小组的鸟类专家小组，会议纪要，2004年7月18日至22日，'T HORNTJE，TEXEL，荷兰
4. Multi-Dialect Speech Recognition in English Using Attention on Ensemble of Experts [C] . Amit Das, Kshitiz Kumar, Jian Wu IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing . 2021

机译：使用专家集团的英语在英语中的多方言语音识别
5. Disruptive Technologies, Divided Experts: Scientific Knowledge, Development, and the Problem of Stabilising Change, Zambia 1945-2010 [D] . Bowman, Andrew John. 2012

机译：颠覆性技术，分散的专家：科学知识，发展与稳定变革问题，赞比亚1945-2010年
6. Challenges and opportunities of acquiring scientific authority in medical sciences: determination of the experts’ views based on qualitative content analysis [O] . SOLEIMAN AHMADY, PhD, NASRIN KHAJEALI, 2020

机译：获得医学科学权威的挑战和机遇：基于定性内容分析确定专家的观点
7. We develop a model of scientific creativity and test it in the field of rare diseases. Our model is based on the results of an in-depth case study of the Rett syndrome. Archival analysis, bibliometric techniques and expert surveys are combined with network analysis to identify the most creative scientists. First, alternative measures of generative and combinatorial creativity are compared. Then, we generalize our results and present a stochastic model of socio-semantic network evolution. The model predictions are tested with multiple networks of rare disease specialties. We find that new scientific collaborations among experts in a field enhance combinatorial creativity. Instead, high entry rates of novices are negatively related to generative creativity. By extending the set of useful concepts, creative scientists gain in centrality. At the same time, by increasing their centrality in the scientific community, scientists can replicate and generalize their results, thus contributing to a scientific paradigm. [O] . Massimo Riccaboni, Maria Laura Frigotto 100

机译：我们开发了一种科学创造力模型，并在稀有疾病领域进行测试。我们的模型基于对Rett综合征的深入案例研究的结果。档案分析，文献计量技术和专家调查与网络分析相结合，以确定最具创造力的科学家。首先，比较生成和组合创造力的替代措施。然后，我们推广了我们的结果，并提出了社会语义网络演化的随机模型。模型预测用多个罕见疾病专业网络进行测试。我们发现，一个领域的专家之间的新的科学合作增强了组合创造力。相反，新手的高入门率与生成创造力负相关。通过扩展这组有用的概念，创造性的科学家获得了中心地位。同时，通过增加科学界的中心地位，科学家们可以复制和推广他们的结果，从而促进科学范式的发展。
8. Building the Next Generation of Scientific Explorers through Active Engagement with STEM Experts and International Space Station Resources. [R] . Graff, P. V., Vanderbloemen, L., Higgins, M., 2015

机译：通过积极参与sTEm专家和国际空间站资源，建设下一代科学探索者。

Scientific experts: more attention needed

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅