首页> 外文期刊>Neophilologus >Art And Morality In Chaucer’S Friar’S Tale and the Decameron, Day One, Story One
【24h】

Art And Morality In Chaucer’S Friar’S Tale and the Decameron, Day One, Story One

机译:乔uc的男修道士的故事和十进位制中的艺术与道德,第一天,故事一

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Chaucers Friars Tale is now usually classified as an exemplum, and most commentary in the last seventeen years has concentrated on elucidating its religious significance and its relation to medieval theological dogmas and controversies. Its humorous or satirical effect, that is, the Art of the embodiment of this moral kernel, has been largely ignored. However, the probable source of the narrative, a sermon by Robert Rypon, acknowledges the humorous potential of the story. In fact, Chaucers tale , while not borrowing story elements from Boccaccios Decameron, has many similarities in structure, style, characterization , narrative perspective and overall ingegno to Day One, Story One. Like Boccaccios story, the Friars Tale has no hidden kernel of significacio beneath its shell, but is an overt and sceptical presentation of ecclesiastical corruption which has far more in common with Boccaccios humorous anti-fraternal satire than with medieval or modern exegesis.
机译:Chaucers Friars Tale现在通常被列为典范,在过去的十七年中,大多数评论都集中在阐明其宗教意义以及与中世纪神学教条和争议的关系。它的幽默或讽刺效果,即这种道德核心体现的艺术,已被很大程度上忽略。然而,罗伯特·雷彭(Robert Rypon)的布道是叙事的可能来源,它承认了故事的幽默潜力。实际上,乔uc斯的故事虽然没有借鉴Boccaccios Decameron的故事元素,但在结构,风格,特征,叙事视角和总体构想方面与第一天,故事一有很多相似之处。与Boccaccios的故事一样,男修道士的故事在其外壳下没有隐藏的意义内核,而是公开和怀疑的教会腐败表现,与Boccaccios幽默的反兄弟讽刺讽刺作品相比,它具有更多的共同之处,而不是中世纪或现代的释经法。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Neophilologus》 |2005年第1期|139-152|共14页
  • 作者

    John Finlayson;

  • 作者单位

    Cambridge, England;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号