首页> 外文期刊>Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation >Mortality rate comparison after switching from continuous to prolonged intermittent renal replacement for acute kidney injuryn in three intensive care units from different countries
【24h】

Mortality rate comparison after switching from continuous to prolonged intermittent renal replacement for acute kidney injuryn in three intensive care units from different countries

机译:在来自不同国家的三个重症监护病房中,从连续性肾脏替代治疗到长期性间断性肾脏替代治疗对急性肾损伤的死亡率比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background. Prolonged intermittent renal replacement therapy (PIRRT) is a dialysis modality for critically ill patients that in theory combines the superior detoxification and haemodynamic stability of the continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) with the operational convenience, reduced haemorrhagic risk and low cost of conventional intermittent haemodialysis. However, the extent to which PIRRT should replace these other modalities is uncertain because comparative studies of mortality are lacking. We retrospectively examined the mortality data from three general intensive care units (ICUs) in different countries that have switched their predominant therapeutic approach from CRRT to PIRRT. We assessed whether this practice change was associated with a change in mortality rate.
机译:背景。长期间歇性肾脏替代疗法(PIRRT)是重症患者的一种透析方式,理论上将连续性肾脏替代疗法(CRRT)的优异排毒和血液动力学稳定性与操作便利性,降低的出血风险和常规间歇性血液透析的低成本相结合。然而,由于缺乏对死亡率的比较研究,PIRRT替代这些其他方式的程度尚不确定。我们回顾性研究了来自不同国家的三个普通重症监护病房(ICU)的死亡率数据,这些病房已将其主要治疗方法从CRRT改为PIRRT。我们评估了这种做法的变化是否与死亡率的变化有关。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation》 |2011年第7期|p.2169-2175|共7页
  • 作者

    Alan P.N. Rankin;

  • 作者单位

    University of Auckland, @%@, Middlemore Hospital, @%@, Gold Coast Hospital, @%@, Parma University Hospital, @%@, Bond University, @%@, Middlemore Hospital,;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号