...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>New Political Economy >Forget English Freedom, Remember Atlantic Slavery: Common Law, Commercial Law and the Significance of Slavery for Classical Political Economy
【24h】

Forget English Freedom, Remember Atlantic Slavery: Common Law, Commercial Law and the Significance of Slavery for Classical Political Economy

机译：忘记英语自由，记住大西洋奴隶制：普通法，商法和奴隶制对古典政治经济学的意义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Is the liberty to pursue individual self-interest in the capitalist market all that remains of the grand Enlightenment promise of human emancipation? The article addresses this question by returning to eighteenth century scholarship on the relationship between English common law and commercial law. Specifically, I explore the fundamental challenge posed to common law by the regulation, through commercial law, of enslaved Africans as labouring ‘things’. I show how key British scholars in the eighteenth century traditions of jurisprudence, moral philosophy and political economy struggled to address the radical unfreedom of the enslaved and the meaning of her/his radical emancipation. I explore how this Atlantic challenge was ‘indigenised’ to speak to the threat posed by enclosures in Britain, in particular, the possible destruction of the qualified unfreedoms and freedoms extant in the paternal social order upheld by common law. I explore how political economy traditions pre and post abolition and emancipation sought to deal with this challenge. And I conjecture on the significance of remembering the most radical process of commodifying labour - in Aimé Césaire's terms, thingification - for present day interpretations of the relationship between capitalism and freedom.View full textDownload full textKeywordsslavery, political economy, common law, Marx, MillRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2011.639871
机译：在资本主义市场上追求个人自我利益的自由，是人类解放的宏大启迪承诺的全部剩余吗？本文通过回到18世纪关于英国普通法和商法之间关系的奖学金来解决这个问题。具体而言，我探讨了通过商业法对奴役的非洲人作为劳动“事物”的管制对普通法构成的根本挑战。我展示了18世纪法学，道德哲学和政治经济学传统中的主要英国学者如何努力解决被奴役者的极端自由和她/他的彻底解放的意义。我探讨了这种大西洋挑战如何“本土化”，以应对英国围封所带来的威胁，尤其是可能破坏普通法所维护的父系社会秩序中所存在的合格的自由和自由。我探讨了废除和解放前后的政治经济学传统如何应对这一挑战。我猜想要记住最激进的使商品商品化的过程的重要性-以埃米尔·塞萨尔（AiméCésaire）的话，物化-对于当今对资本主义与自由之间关系的解释。查看全文下载全文关键字奴隶制，政治经济，普通法，马克思，米尔（MalRelated），相关变量var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand：“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”，servicescompact：“ citeulike，netvibes，twitter，technorati，delicious，linkedin，facebook，stumbleupon，digg，google，更多”，发布日期：“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”} ;添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2011.639871

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号