首页> 外文期刊>New scientist >The missing metric
【24h】

The missing metric

机译:缺失指标

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

How many vaccines do you think it takes to fully immunise a child? One? Three? Perhaps five? By the World Health Organization's reckoning, that number is 11-that's 11 key vaccines every child should have to protect them from a range of devastating diseases. So why then are we only using three to measure immunisation coverage? By doing so, we are not only giving ourselves a skewed perspective of the state of global childhood immunisation, but we are also in danger of thinking it's job done, when we still have far to go. At first glance, it appears that we have almost won this particular health battle, with the proportion of the world's children receiving routine vaccinations climbing steadily from 73 per cent a decade ago to about 83 per cent today. But that's only when you measure the uptake of three basic childhood vaccines, completed on the third dose of diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP).
机译:您认为为儿童完全免疫需要多少疫苗?一?三?也许五个?根据世界卫生组织的估计,这个数字是11,这是每个孩子必须保护它们免受一系列毁灭性疾病侵害的11种关键疫苗。那么为什么我们只用三个来衡量免疫覆盖率呢?这样一来,我们不仅会给自己一种对全球儿童免疫状况的偏见,而且在我们还有很长的路要走时,我们有危险认为它已经完成了。乍一看,我们似乎几乎赢得了这场特殊的健康战,全世界接受常规疫苗接种的儿童比例从十年前的73%稳步上升到今天的约83%。但这仅是在您测量三种基本的儿童疫苗的摄入量时,它们是在第三剂白喉-破伤风-百日咳(DTP)上完成的。

著录项

  • 来源
    《New scientist》 |2014年第2955期|26-27|共2页
  • 作者

    Seth Berkley;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号