...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Ocean & coastal management >Mapping of ecosystem services flow in Mida Creek, Kenya
【24h】

Mapping of ecosystem services flow in Mida Creek, Kenya

机译：肯尼亚米达河的生态系统服务流图

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The concept of ecosystem services (ES) and its application in natural resources management decision making is a new conservation paradigm. A better understanding of ES in resource-rich developing countries can contribute to poverty alleviation and sustainable development, while at the same time conserving natural resources. This study assessed the flow of ES in Mida Creek, a marine reserve in Kenya, with the aim of characterizing land use/land cover (LULC) classes, spatially mapping distribution of ES, identifying important ES, and establishing the opinions of experts on ES flow. A qualitative and quantitative assessment was carried out coupling expert scores and LULC maps in a matrix structure. A participatory approach was used to engage and raise awareness with the community groups who actively participate in conservation activities in the creek, together with researchers/academics/managers who also are involved with the management of the reserve. The study was carried out between July and October 2015 and a total of 65 participants were involved. Datasets were collected using questionnaires in which ecosystem service flow was scored based on expert estimates per LULC class against the selected ES. Data were assessed using statistical and spatial analysis techniques. Results for the flow of provisioning services showed that, while palm trees were the main source of firewood (68%), other vegetation types were also an important source for wood products, including charcoal (46%), construction poles (54%) and fishing gear (68%). There was also a high flow of provisioning services (sea food and bait organisms) from water bodies (82%) and mangroves (80%). Flow for regulating services was mainly from mangroves, and for cultural services from beaches, mangroves and water bodies. Saline bare areas and sand flats scored least for all the ES. There were statistically significant differences in the scoring of the LULC against the different categories of provisioning, regulating and cultural services between the local communities and the other stakeholders. The method shows both the location of the resources utilized by the communities and, also, facilitates communication between these communities and the decision makers, thereby providing an example of a Management strategy at the local scale for other coastal regions of Kenya and elsewhere. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译：生态系统服务（ES）的概念及其在自然资源管理决策中的应用是一种新的保护范式。在资源丰富的发展中国家中更好地了解环境与社会可以促进减轻贫困和可持续发展，同时保护自然资源。这项研究评估了ES在肯尼亚海洋保护区Mida Creek的流量，目的是表征土地利用/土地覆盖（LULC）类，ES的空间分布图绘制，确定重要的ES并建立专家对ES的意见流。定性和定量评估是在矩阵结构中结合专家评分和LULC图进行的。使用参与式方法与积极参与小河保护活动的社区团体以及也参与保护区管理的研究人员/学术人员/管理人员共同参与并提高意识。这项研究于2015年7月至2015年10月进行，共有65名参与者参加。使用调查表收集数据集，在该调查表中，根据每个LULC类别针对所选ES的专家估计，对生态系统服务流进行了评分。使用统计和空间分析技术评估数据。提供服务的结果显示，虽然棕榈树是薪柴的主要来源（68％），但其他植被类型也是木制品的重要来源，包括木炭（46％），电线杆（54％）和木炭。渔具（68％）。来自水体（82％）和红树林（80％）的供应服务（海鲜和诱饵生物）的流量也很大。调节服务的流量主要来自红树林，而文化服务则来自海滩，红树林和水体。在所有ES中，盐渍裸地和沙地平地得分最低。在地方社区与其他利益相关者之间，针对提供，监管和文化服务的不同类别，LULC的评分在统计上存在显着差异。该方法不仅显示了社区利用的资源的位置，而且还促进了这些社区与决策者之间的交流，从而为肯尼亚其他沿海地区和其他地方的地方规模管理战略提供了一个范例。 （C）2017 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Ocean & coastal management》 |2017年第5期|11-21|共11页
  • 作者

    Awuor Owuor Margaret; Icely John; Newton Alice; Nyunja Judith; Otieno Philip; Omondi Tuda Arthur; Oduor Nancy;

  • 作者单位

    Univ Cadiz, Campus Puerto Real, Cadiz 11519, Spain|Univ Empresa Prov Cadiz, FUECA La Fdn, Cadiz 11003, Spain|South Eastern Kenya Univ, Dept Appl Limnol & Marine Sci, POB 170-90200, Kitui, Kenya|Univ Algarve, CIMA Gambelas Campus, P-8005139 Faro, Portugal;

    Univ Algarve, CIMA Gambelas Campus, P-8005139 Faro, Portugal;

    Univ Algarve, CIMA Gambelas Campus, P-8005139 Faro, Portugal|NILU IMPEC, Box 100, N-2027 Kjeller, Norway;

    Kenya Wildlife Serv, Coast Conservat Area, POB 82144-80100, Mombasa, Kenya;

    Univ Nairobi, Ctr Adv Studies Environm Law & Policy, POB 30197-00100, Nairobi, Kenya;

    Univ Cadiz, Campus Puerto Real, Cadiz 11519, Spain|Univ Empresa Prov Cadiz, FUECA La Fdn, Cadiz 11003, Spain|Univ Algarve, CIMA Gambelas Campus, P-8005139 Faro, Portugal|Kenya Wildlife Serv, Coast Conservat Area, POB 82144-80100, Mombasa, Kenya;

    Kenya Marine & Fisheries Res Inst, Mombasa Stn, POB 81657-80100, Mombasa, Kenya;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Marine protected areas; Management effectiveness; Ecosystem services; Stakeholder participation; Mida Creek; Kenya;

    机译：海洋保护区;管理有效性;生态系统服务;利益相关者的参与;米达河;肯尼亚;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号