...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Ocean & coastal management >The coproduction of knowledge and policy in coastal governance: Integrating mussel fisheries and nature restoration
【24h】

The coproduction of knowledge and policy in coastal governance: Integrating mussel fisheries and nature restoration

机译：沿海治理中知识和政策的联合产生：贻贝渔业与自然恢复相结合

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

One of the challenges of coastal governance is to connect a variety of knowledge systems. The purpose of this paper is to show how a coastal governance practice can emerge and stabilize, such that actors with disparate knowledge systems collaborate towards the shared goal of sustainable resource use. We analyze this stabilization in terms of the coproduction of knowledge and policy. This paper is empirically informed by a case study on the transition towards a sustainable mussel fishery in the Dutch Wadden Sea. Our study illuminates the difficulties of underpinning a coastal governance practice with scientific research, since the relevance, quality, and results of research are interpreted differently from the perspectives of resource users and conservationists. Furthermore, our analysis shows that such a governance practice can stabilize through a combination of rule negotiation, legal, societal, and political pressure, along with collaborative knowledge creation. Based on our analysis, we identify several aspects of collaborative knowledge creation that enable the formation of a shared knowledge base for governance in a context of controversy. These include the shared ownership of research, knowledge creation as an integral part of governance, a focus on data and basic facts, and the close involvement of trusted experts. The findings of this study suggest that a controversial setting strongly structures knowledge creation, while at the same time knowledge creation enables coastal governance as a way of dealing with conflicts. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译：沿海治理的挑战之一是连接各种知识系统。本文的目的是说明沿海治理实践是如何出现和稳定的，从而使具有不同知识体系的行为者相互协作，以实现资源可持续利用的共同目标。我们根据知识和政策的共同产生来分析这种稳定。本文以荷兰瓦登海向可持续贻贝渔业过渡的案例研究为依据提供了经验。我们的研究阐明了用科学研究为沿海治理实践提供支撑的困难，因为从资源使用者和保护主义者的角度对研究的相关性，质量和研究结果进行了不同的解释。此外，我们的分析表明，通过规则谈判，法律，社会和政治压力以及协作性知识创造的组合，这种治理实践可以稳定下来。根据我们的分析，我们确定了协作知识创建的几个方面，这些方面使得能够在有争议的情况下形成用于治理的共享知识库。其中包括研究的共享所有权，作为治理不可或缺的一部分的知识创造，对数据和基本事实的关注以及值得信赖的专家的密切参与。这项研究的结果表明，有争议的环境在很大程度上构成了知识创造，而知识创造又使沿海治理成为解决冲突的一种方式。 （C）2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号