首页> 外文期刊>Ocean & coastal management >Is the EU's Fisheries Partnership Agreement (FPA) with Mauritania a genuine partnership or exploitation by the EU?
【24h】

Is the EU's Fisheries Partnership Agreement (FPA) with Mauritania a genuine partnership or exploitation by the EU?

机译:欧盟与毛里塔尼亚的渔业伙伴关系协议(FPA)是欧盟的真正伙伴关系还是剥削?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The EU's fisheries agreements with West African states have long been criticised by NGOs for exporting the EU's problem of over-exploiting its own fish stocks to African waters. To meet these criticisms, the EU introduced in 2003 a new form of fisheries agreement, the Fisheries Partnership Agreement (FPA), replacing purely commercial deals with a commitment to sharing decision-making with the African states to sustainably develop their fisheries. However, some critics claim that despite the EU's good intentions, little has changed: the partnerships are dominated by the EU and the fish stocks in the African states' waters are still being over-fished to serve the needs of the EU, not the African states. In this paper, the working of the FPA between the EU and Mauritania is investigated to determine whether a genuine partnership has been established, or whether the FPA is a thinly disguised form of EU exploitation, using the fashionable model of partnership as a cover or mask. The findings are that while the FPA is a significant improvement on the EU's previous fisheries relationship with Mauritania, it falls short of a genuine partnership, and it needs several reforms if it is to meet not only its own specifications of what constitutes the FPA, but also wider, aspirational notions of the essence of partnership.
机译:长期以来,非政府组织一直批评欧盟与西非国家的渔业协议将欧盟过度利用自己的鱼类资源的问题出口到非洲水域。为了应对这些批评,欧盟于2003年推出了一种新形式的渔业协议,即《渔业合作协议》(FPA),以与非洲国家共同分享决策权以可持续发展其渔业的承诺取代了纯商业交易。但是,一些批评家声称,尽管欧盟有良好的意愿,但变化不大:伙伴关系以欧盟为主导,非洲各州水域的鱼类种群仍被过度捕捞,无法满足欧盟而不是非洲国家的需求状态。在本文中,对欧盟和毛里塔尼亚之间的FPA的工作进行了调查,以确定是否建立了真正的伙伴关系,或者FPA是不是将欧洲伙伴关系作为一种掩盖或掩饰的形式,使用了流行的伙伴关系模型作为掩盖或掩盖。调查结果是,虽然FPA是对欧盟以前与毛里塔尼亚的渔业关系的重大改进,但它缺乏真正的伙伴关系,如果要不仅满足其本身对FPA构成的要求,还需要进行多项改革。伙伴关系的本质也有更广泛,理想的概念。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Ocean & coastal management》 |2012年第2期|p.26-34|共9页
  • 作者

    Philipp Nagel; Tim Gray;

  • 作者单位

    Postgraduate, Environmental Governance Section, Institute of Forest and Environmental Politics, University of Freiburg, Germany;

    School of Geography, Politics and Sociology, Newcastle University, 40-42 Great North Road, Newcastle on Tyne NE1 7RU, UK;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号