...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Ocean & coastal management >Including coastal resource users in fisheries management evaluation of San Miguel Bay, Philippines
【24h】

Including coastal resource users in fisheries management evaluation of San Miguel Bay, Philippines

机译：在菲律宾圣米格尔湾的渔业管理评估中纳入沿海资源使用者

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This paper examines an approach that integrates the judgment and perceptions of coastal resource users in prioritizing the criteria and indicators for fisheries management impact evaluation. Five criteria with corresponding indicators were identified and selected namely, acceptability, biotic diversity, economic performance, enforceability, and equity. The weights of importance of criteria and indicators were determined through the Analytic Hierarchy Process applied in a case study with 23 resource user groups (categorized as fishers, local government unit, non-government organization, private sector and women) in San Miguel Bay, Philippines.The results of this study revealed that overall, acceptability is the most important criterion in evaluating the impacts of fisheries management strategy in San Miguel Bay, especially for the local government units and fishers groups. The best measure of acceptability criterion are the indicators resource users participation in fisheries management process, level of awareness of resource users in fisheries resource management and number of fishers who belong to an organization. Ten groups have consistency ratios between 0.0 and 0.08 which are within the acceptable level of 0.10. Conversely, most groups (78%) have consistency ratios less than 0.26. Also, the results of the preference analysis are remarkable because among the representative groups, most fishers groups exhibited consistencies in their judgments (average consistency ratios of 0.06-0.08). Economic performance indicators were consistently judged across groups indicating that individuals present higher convergence of views toward economic objective.
机译：本文研究了一种方法，该方法将沿海资源使用者的判断和看法整合在一起，从而为渔业管理影响评估的标准和指标确定了优先顺序。确定并选择了五个具有相应指标的标准，即可接受性，生物多样性，经济绩效，可执行性和公平性。通过在菲律宾圣米格尔湾的23个资源用户组（分类为渔民，地方政府部门，非政府组织，私营部门和妇女）的案例研究中应用的分析层次结构，确定了标准和指标的重要性权重。这项研究的结果表明，总体而言，可接受性是评估圣米格尔湾渔业管理策略的影响的最重要标准，尤其是对地方政府部门和渔民团体而言。可接受标准的最佳衡量标准是资源使用者参与渔业管理过程的指标，渔业资源管理中资源使用者的意识水平以及所属组织的渔民数量。十组的稠度比在0.0到0.08之间，在0.10的可接受水平内。相反，大多数组（78％）的一致性比率小于0.26。同样，偏好分析的结果也很出色，因为在代表性的群体中，大多数渔民群体的判断都具有一致性（平均一致性比率为0.06-0.08）。各个群体对经济绩效指标的判断一致，表明个人对经济目标的看法趋同。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Ocean & coastal management》 |2011年第10期|p.760-770|共11页
  • 作者

    Medina N. Andalecio;

  • 作者单位

    Institute of Fisheries Policy and Development Studies, College of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences, University of the Philippines Visayas, Miag-ao, Iloilo 5023, Philippines;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号