Evaluation of Scientific Evidence by International Courts and Tribunals in the Continental Shelf Delimitation Cases

Liao Xuexia

首页> 外文期刊>Ocean Development & International Law >Evaluation of Scientific Evidence by International Courts and Tribunals in the Continental Shelf Delimitation Cases

【24h】

Evaluation of Scientific Evidence by International Courts and Tribunals in the Continental Shelf Delimitation Cases

机译：国际法院和法庭在大陆架划界案件中对科学证据的评价

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

Evaluation of scientific evidence is one of the challenges arising in the tribunal and court cases that deal with the continental shelf beyond 200 nautical miles (nm). Given the difficulties rooted in the interface between law and science regarding the establishment of the entitlement to the continental shelf beyond 200nm, the current judicial practice offers limited guidance in enhancing transparency and openness in evaluating the scientific evidence. Utilizing procedures providing for the assistance of experts is advisable, as this could facilitate the achievement of an equitable solution in the cases.

机译：科学证据的评估是涉及超过200海里（nm）大陆架的法庭和法院案件所面临的挑战之一。鉴于法律和科学之间的接口存在根深蒂固的问题，即建立200海里以上大陆架的权利，目前的司法实践在提高评估科学证据的透明度和开放性方面提供了有限的指导。建议使用提供专家协助的程序，因为这可以促进案件中的公平解决。

著录项

来源
《Ocean Development & International Law》 |2017年第2期|136-157|共22页
作者
Liao Xuexia;
展开▼
作者单位

Grad Inst Int & Dev Studies, Geneva, Switzerland;

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类
关键词
Continental shelf beyond 200 nautical miles; international courts and tribunals; scientific evidence;

机译：超过200海里的大陆架;国际法院和法庭;科学证据;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. The Admissibility of a Plea to an International Adjudicative Forum to Delimit the Outer Continental Shelf Prior to the Adoption of Final Recommendations by the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf [J] . Bjorn Kunoy International journal of marine and coastal law . 2010,第2期

机译：在大陆架界限委员会通过最后建议之前，可以接受国际划界论坛来界定外部大陆架
2. BARBADOS/TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO: UN Convention on the Law of the Sea Annex VII Arbitral Tribunal maritime delimitation award regarding the continental shelf and EEZ [J] . Barbara Kwiatkowska American Journal of International Law . 2007,第1期

机译：巴塞罗那/特立尼达和多巴哥：联合国海洋法公约附件七仲裁庭关于大陆架和专属经济区的海域划界奖
3. Decisions of international tribunals: the international court of justice. I. Case concerning maritime delimitation and territorial questions between Qatar and Bahrain (Qatar v Bahrain) [J] . M. D. Evans International and Comparative Law Quarterly . 2002,第3期

机译：国际法庭的决定：国际法院。一。关于卡塔尔和巴林之间的海洋划界和领土问题的案件（卡塔尔诉巴林）
4. THE IMPACT OF SATELLITE DATA USED BY HIGH INTERNATIONAL COURTS LIKE THE ICJ (INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE) AND ITLOS (INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE LAW OF THE SEA) [C] . Annette Froehlich IAC;International Astronautical Congress . 2012

机译：高级国际法院使用的卫星数据的影响，例如国际法院（国际法院）和国际法院（国际海洋法法庭）
5. The Contribution of Non-Governmental Organizations to an Emerging Global South Regimen in International Criminal Justice: The Cases of International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) and Extraordinary Chambers in the Court of Cambodia (ECCC) [D] . Abbey, Wendy NY. 2018

机译：非政府组织对新兴的全球南方组织在国际刑事司法中的贡献：卢旺达国际刑事法庭（ICTR）和柬埔寨法院特别法庭（ECCC）的案例
6. Scientific Evaluation of the Court Evidence Submitted to the 2019 Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Libel Case and Its Decision in Japan [O] . Jason M. Bodily, Ikuo Tsunoda, J. Steven Alexander 2020

机译：科学评估法院证据提交给2019年人乳头瘤病毒疫苗诽谤案件及其在日本的决定
7. Delimiting the Continental Shelf Beyond 200 Nautical Miles at the International Court of Justice: The Nicaragua v. Colombia Cases [O] . Massimo Lando 2017

机译：划定在国际正义法庭上的200海里大陆的大陆架：尼加拉瓜诉哥伦比亚病例

Evaluation of Scientific Evidence by International Courts and Tribunals in the Continental Shelf Delimitation Cases

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅