• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Ocean Development & International Law >The Practice of the Concept of Fishing Entities: Dispute Settlement Mechanisms
【24h】

The Practice of the Concept of Fishing Entities: Dispute Settlement Mechanisms

机译：捕捞实体概念的实践：争端解决机制

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Although the term and concept of fishing entities is in the 1995 U.N. Fish Stocks Agreement (UNFSA), it is through the regional fishery management organizations (RFMOs) that fishing entities may receive benefits and rights to fish and other matters. Three RFMOs (the Commission for the Conservation of Bluefin Tuna (CCSBT), the Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission (IATTC), and the Commission on the Conservation and Management of Highly Migratory Fish Stocks in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean (WCPFC)) have gone through the process of either amending or redrafting their constituent instruments or adopting a specific resolution for the purposes of implementing the UNFSA. This paper reviews how and to what extent these three RFMOs have incorporated fishing entities into the constituent instruments by examining the various mechanisms for settling disputes involving fishing entities.
机译：尽管捕捞实体的术语和概念是在1995年《联合国鱼类种群协定》（UNFSA）中，但通过区域渔业管理组织（RFMO），捕捞实体可能会获得鱼类和其他事项的利益和权利。三个区域渔业管理组织（蓝鳍金枪鱼养护委员会（CCSBT），美洲热带金枪鱼委员会（IATTC）以及西太平洋和中太平洋高度Mi游鱼类种群的养护和管理委员会（WCPFC））为了执行《非洲统一框架》，已经经历了修改或重新起草其组成文书或通过一项具体决议的过程。本文通过研究解决涉及渔业实体纠纷的各种机制，回顾了这三个区域渔业管理组织如何以及在何种程度上将渔业实体纳入组成工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号