...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Ocean development and international law >The Adjacency Doctrine in the Negotiation of BBNJ: Creeping Jurisdiction or Legitimate Claim?
【24h】

The Adjacency Doctrine in the Negotiation of BBNJ: Creeping Jurisdiction or Legitimate Claim?

机译：BBNJ谈判中的邻接学说：匍匐管辖权或合法索赔？

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Adjacency, notwithstanding its status as a basis for generating maritime entitlements, has no place as a principle under the existing law of the sea. To endow it with such status in the negotiation of an agreement for the conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction (BBNJ) is likely to upset the delicate balance between the rights of coastal states and those of the international community, which is essential to the widespread acceptance of United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). This article argues that the access regime for marine genetic resources (MGRs) straddling the boundary between areas beyond national jurisdiction (ABNJ) and areas within national jurisdiction (AWNJ) should be location based, and adjacent coastal states should not be accorded preferential rights in the distribution of benefits. However, due regard should be paid to the rights and legitimate interests of adjacent coastal states when transboundary impacts may result from measures adopted for and activities conducted in ABNJ, including those that directly affect MGRs straddling the boundary between ABNJ and AWNJ. At the procedural level, coastal states should be allowed to participate, primarily through prior notification and consultation, in the adoption of area-based management tools (ABMTs) in ABNJ and the conduct of environmental impact assessment (EIA) with respect to activities therein.
机译：邻接，尽管有其作为产生海事权利的基础，但在现有海洋法律下没有任何地方。为了赋予谈判在国内管辖范围之外的区域保护和可持续使用海洋生物多样性的协议中的这种状态（BBNJ）可能会破坏沿海国家和国际社会权利之间的微妙平衡，这对于普遍接受“联合国海洋法公约”（UNCLOS）至关重要。本文认为，海洋遗传资源（MGR）的访问制度跨越国家管辖区（ABNJ）和国家管辖范围内的地区之间的边界（ABNJ）应该是基于位置的，并且邻近沿海国家不应赋予优惠权利福利分配。但是，应当应对邻近沿海国家的权利和合法利益，当ABNJ中采取的措施和活动中所采取的措施产生跨界影响，包括直接影响MGRS跨越ABNJ和AWNJ之间的边界的人。在程序层面，应允许沿海国家参与，主要通过先前通知和咨询，在ABNJ中采用基于地区的管理工具（ABMTS）以及在其中的活动方面进行环境影响评估（EIA）。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号