...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Oceanography >Getting Ocean Acidification on Decision Makers' To-Do Lists Dissecting the Process Through Case Studies
【24h】

Getting Ocean Acidification on Decision Makers' To-Do Lists Dissecting the Process Through Case Studies

机译：通过案例研究在决策者的待办事项清单上实现海洋酸化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Much detailed, incremental knowledge being generated by current scientific research on ocean acidification (OA) does not directly address the need of decision makers, who are asking broad question such-as: Where will OA harm marine resources next? When will this happen? Who will be affected? And how much will it cost? In this review, we use a series of mainly US-based case studies to explore the needs of local to international-scale groups that are making decisions to address OA concerns. Decisions concerning OA have been made most naturally and easily when information needs were clearly defined and closely aligned with science outputs and initiatives. For decisions requiring more complex information, the process slows dramatically. Decision making about OA is greatly aided (1) when a mixture of specialists participates, including scientists, resource users and managers, and policy and law makers; (2) when goals can be clearly agreed upon at the beginning of the process; (3) when mixed groups of specialists plan and create translational documents explaining the likely outcomes of policy decisions on ecosystems and natural resources; (4) when regional work on OA fits into an existing set of priorities concerning climate or water quality; and (5) when decision making can be reviewed and enhanced.
机译：当前有关海洋酸化（OA）的科学研究所产生的许多详细的增量知识并不能直接满足决策者的需求，决策者们正在提出广泛的问题，例如：OA下一步将在哪里损害海洋资源？什么时候会发生？谁会受到影响？多少钱？在这篇综述中，我们使用了一系列主要基于美国的案例研究，以探讨为解决OA问题而做出决策的本地到国际规模组织的需求。当明确定义信息需求并使其与科学产出和计划紧密结合时，最自然，最轻松地做出有关OA的决策。对于需要更多复杂信息的决策，该过程将大大减慢速度。 OA的决策提供了极大的帮助（1）包括科学家，资源用户和管理人员以及政策和法律制定者在内的专家的共同参与； （2）在流程开始时可以明确达成目标的时间； （3）当混合的专家小组计划并创建翻译文件时，解释有关生态系统和自然资源的政策决定的可能结果； （4）当有关开放获取的区域工作适合有关气候或水质的现有优先重点时； （5）何时可以审查和加强决策。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Oceanography》 |2015年第2期|198-211|共14页
  • 作者

    Cooley Sarah R.; Jewett Elizabeth B.; Reichert Julie; Robbins Lisa; Shrestha Gyami; Wieczorek Dan; Weisberg Stephen B.;

  • 作者单位

    Ocean Conservancy, Washington, DC 20036 USA;

    NOAA, Ocean Acidificat Program, Silver Spring, MD USA;

    Oyster Recovery Partnership, Annapolis, MD USA;

    US Geol Survey, Coastal & Marine Sci Ctr, St Petersburg, FL USA;

    US Global Change Res Program, US Carbon Cycle Sci Program Off, Washington, DC USA;

    NOAA, Natl Marine Fisheries Serv, Sandy Hook, NJ USA;

    Southern Calif Coastal Water Res Project Author, Costa Mesa, CA USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号