Commentary on 'a review of research on the negative accounting relationship between risk and return: Bowman's paradox by M.N. Nickel and M.C. Rodriguez'

Patrick L. Brockett; William W. Cooper; K.H. Kwon; T.W. Ruefli

首页> 外文期刊>Omega >Commentary on 'a review of research on the negative accounting relationship between risk and return: Bowman's paradox by M.N. Nickel and M.C. Rodriguez'

【24h】

Commentary on 'a review of research on the negative accounting relationship between risk and return: Bowman's paradox by M.N. Nickel and M.C. Rodriguez'

机译：评论“对风险与收益之间的负会计关系的研究综述：M.N。Nickel和M.C. Rodriguez的Bowman悖论”

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

The February 2002 issue of Omega contains an article by M.N. Nickel and M.C. Rodriguez which reviews and evaluates research dealing with what is called the "Bowman Paradox" in the literature of strategic management. Using accounting reports from business firms this paradox arises from the persistent showing that risk and return are negatively related―i.e., high risk is associated with low return and low risk is associated with high return. The present commentary describes an article in a literature not covered by Nickel and Rodriguez which (a) extends the Bowman Paradox to mutual fund reports based on market data and (b) resolves the outstanding problems noted by Nickel and Rodriguez as needing further research.

机译：2002年2月出版的《欧米茄》收录了M.N.镍和MC罗德里格斯（Rodriguez）审查和评估有关战略管理文献中所谓的“鲍曼悖论”的研究。使用来自商业公司的会计报告，这种悖论源于持续显示风险和回报负相关的现象，即高风险与低回报相关，而低风险与高回报相关。本评论描述了Nickel和Rodriguez未涵盖的文献中的一篇文章，该文章（a）根据市场数据将Bowman Paradox扩展到共同基金报告，并且（b）解决了Nickel和Rodriguez指出的需要进一步研究的突出问题。

著录项

来源
《Omega》 |2003年第5期|p.409-412|共4页
作者
Patrick L. Brockett; William W. Cooper; K.H. Kwon; T.W. Ruefli;
展开▼
作者单位

The Red McCombs School of Business, The University of Texas at Austin, University Station B6500 Austin, TX 78712-0212, USA;

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类经济;
关键词
risk and return relations; financial markets; accounting reports;

机译：风险与收益关系;金融市场;会计报告;

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. On the Relationship between Accounting Risk and Return: Is There a (Bowman) Paradox? [J] . Ivan E. Brick, Oded Palmon, Itzhak Venezia European Management Review . 2015,第2期

机译：关于会计风险与收益之间的关系：是否存在（鲍曼）悖论？
2. Bowman's risk-return paradox: An agency theory perspective [J] . Chari Murali D. R., David Parthiban, Duru Augustine, Journal of Business Research . 2019,第FEBa期

机译：鲍曼的风险收益悖论：代理理论的视角
3. Bowman's risk-return paradox: An agency theory perspective [J] . Chari Murali D. R., David Parthiban, Duru Augustine, Journal of Business Research . 2019,第Feba期

机译：鲍曼的风险返回悖论：一个机构理论观点
4. Study on the Risk and Return Paradox in the Emerging Market with Noise Traders (ID: 5-025) [C] . Jiang Jijiao, Yang Naiding, Wang Liang, International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management . 2006

机译：新兴市场噪声交易者的风险与收益悖论研究（ID：5-025）
5. Responding to tripadvisor: How hotel responses to negative online reviews effect guest perception of image, guest intent to stay, and guest intent to return. [D] . Avant, Tiffany L. 2013

机译：回应Tripadvisor：酒店对负面在线评论的回应如何影响顾客对形象的印象，顾客的住宿意愿和顾客的返回意愿。
6. Commentary: Neural correlates of expected risks and returns in risky choice across development [O] . Faisal Mushtaq, Liam J. B. Hill, Amy R. Bland, 2015

机译：评论：整个开发过程中预期风险和风险选择收益的神经关系
7. A review of research on the negative accounting relationship between risk and return: Bowman's paradox [O] . Núñez-Nickel Manuel, Cano Rodríguez Manuel 2002

机译：风险与收益之间负会计关系研究综述：鲍曼的悖论

Commentary on 'a review of research on the negative accounting relationship between risk and return: Bowman's paradox by M.N. Nickel and M.C. Rodriguez'

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅