...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Organization: The Critical Journal of Organization, Theory and Society >Anti-leaders(hip) in Social Movement Organizations: The case of autonomous grassroots groups
【24h】

Anti-leaders(hip) in Social Movement Organizations: The case of autonomous grassroots groups

机译：社会运动组织中的反领导者：以自治基层团体为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Through the Arab Spring and the Occupy movement, the idea of horizontal, leaderless organization has come to the attention of the mass media. In this article we explore radical, participative-democratic alternatives to leadership through an empirical study of four Social Movement Organizations (SMOs). Whilst there has been some writing on leadership within SMOs, it has mirrored the 'mainstream' assumption that leadership is the product of individual leaders possessing certain traits, styles and/or behaviours. In contrast, critical leadership studies (CLS) recognize that leadership is a relational, socially constructed phenomenon rather than the result of a stable set of leadership attributes that inhere in 'the leaders'. We utilize this framing to analyse how leadership is understood and performed in anarchist SMOs by examining how actors manage meaning and define reality without compromising the ideological commitments of their organizations. Furthermore, we also pay attention to the organizational practices and processes developed to: (a) prohibit individuals from permanently assuming a leadership role; (b) distribute leadership skills and roles; and (c) encourage other actors to participate and take-up these roles in the future. We conclude by suggesting that just because an organization is leaderless, it does not necessarily mean that it is also leadershipless.
机译：通过“阿拉伯之春”和“占领运动”，横向，无领导者组织的构想引起了大众媒体的注意。在本文中，我们通过对四个社会运动组织（SMO）的实证研究，探索了领导力的激进，参与性民主替代方案。尽管在SMO中有一些关于领导力的文章，但它反映了“主流”的假设，即领导力是具有某些特征，风格和/或行为的个体领导者的产物。相反，批判性领导力研究（CLS）认识到，领导力是一种关系，社会建构的现象，而不是“领导者”中稳定的一组领导力属性的结果。我们通过研究参与者如何在不损害其组织的意识形态承诺的情况下管理意义和定义现实的方式，利用这一框架来分析无政府主义SMO中如何理解和执行领导。此外，我们还关注为以下目的而开发的组织惯例和过程：（a）禁止个人永久担任领导角色； （b）分配领导技能和角色； （c）鼓励其他参与者将来参与并担任这些角色。我们的结论是，仅仅因为一个组织是无领导的，并不一定意味着它也是无领导的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号