...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Oryx >Can stakeholders agree on how to reduce human-carnivore conflict on Namibian livestock farms? A novel Q-methodology and Delphi exercise
【24h】

Can stakeholders agree on how to reduce human-carnivore conflict on Namibian livestock farms? A novel Q-methodology and Delphi exercise

机译：利益相关者能否就如何减少纳米比亚牲畜农场的食肉动物冲突达成共识？一种新颖的Q方法和Delphi练习

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Conflict between carnivores and livestock farmers affects human livelihoods and predator populations. Historically, successful mitigation of this conflict has been limited, sometimes because of a lack of participation among stakeholders to create and implement agreeable and effective solutions. Finding common ground between stakeholders can, however, be difficult, partly because of the range and intensity of values held. Using a novel combination of Q-methodology and the Delphi technique, I investigated whether a diverse range of stakeholders could agree on how to mitigate conflict between carnivores and livestock farmers in Namibia. A strong consensus was reached on using conservation education and husbandry training to reduce livestock depredation. Two narratives emerged: one group preferred non-lethal methods to manage the conflict, whereas a smaller group preferred lethal measures. This new decision-making exercise has potential to be applied to other conservation conflicts to assist with participatory decision making.
机译：食肉动物和牲畜养殖者之间的冲突影响着人类的生计和捕食者的数量。从历史上看，成功缓解这种冲突的方法是有限的，有时是因为利益相关者缺乏参与来制定和实施令人满意的有效解决方案的参与。但是，在利益相关者之间寻求共同点可能很困难，部分原因是所持有的价值的范围和强度。通过使用Q方法和Delphi技术的新颖结合，我调查了不同利益相关者是否可以就如何减轻纳米比亚食肉动物和牲畜养殖者之间的冲突达成一致。在利用保护教育和畜牧培训减少牲畜掠夺方面达成了强烈共识。出现了两种说法：一组倾向于使用非致命性方法来处理冲突，而另一组则倾向于采用致命性措施。这项新的决策活动可能会应用于其他保护冲突，以协助参与性决策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号