首页> 外文期刊>Oryx >Does the long-term success of REDD plus also depend on biodiversity?
【24h】

Does the long-term success of REDD plus also depend on biodiversity?

机译:REDD plus的长期成功是否还取决于生物多样性?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Originally proposed in 2005 as a way to use financial incentives to tackle global climate change, Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation (REDD) has evolved to include conservation, sustainable management of forests and enhancement of forest carbon stocks, in what is now known as REDD+. Biodiversity protection is still viewed principally as a cobenefit of the REDD+ process, with conservation of forest tree cover and carbon stocks providing the main measure of success. However, focusing solely on tree cover and carbon stocks does not always protect other species, which may be threatened by other factors, most notably hunting. We present evidence from the literature that loss of biodiversity can affect forest composition, tree survival and forest resilience and may in some cases ultimately lead to a reduction in carbon storage. We argue that REDD+ projects should specifically mitigate for threats to biodiversity if they are to maximize carbon storage potential in the long term.
机译:最初于2005年提出,旨在利用财政激励措施应对全球气候变化,减少森林砍伐和森林退化造成的排放已演变为包括养护,森林的可持续管理和森林碳储量的增加,现在称为REDD +。仍然主要将生物多样性保护视为REDD +进程的一项好处,保护林木覆盖和碳储量是成功的主要手段。但是,仅关注树木的覆盖物和碳储量并不能总是保护其他物种,这可能受到其他因素(尤其是狩猎)的威胁。我们从文献中提供的证据表明,生物多样性的丧失会影响森林的组成,树木的生存和森林的复原力,在某些情况下最终可能导致碳储量的减少。我们认为,REDD +项目如果要在长期内最大程度地发挥碳储存潜力,就应该专门减轻对生物多样性的威胁。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号